Dynamic life cycle assessment of solid oxide fuel cell system considering long-term degradation effects

被引:19
作者
Naeini, Mina [1 ]
Cotton, James S. S. [2 ]
Adams II, Thomas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; SOFC; Performance degradation; MODEL; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115336
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this work, we conduct a detailed cradle-to-product life cycle analysis in order to quantify the environmental impact of generating electricity using a conventional natural gas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). In contrast to previous studies, we account for SOFC degradation using a model previously developed by the authors to simulate deterioration in performance of SOFC over operating time. Midpoint environmental impacts were quantified using the ReCiPe 2016 and TRACI 2.1 US-Canada 2008 characterization methodologies in SimaPro. The resulting global warming potential was higher than those reported for SOFCs, which are underestimated because they neglect degradation. The results were compared with the environmental burdens associated with power generation using two conventional combined heat and power systems (i.e., gas turbines and internal combustion engines of various capacities), showing that even when accounting for long-term SOFC degradation impacts, the environmental performance of SOFCs is superior. This is true even though the analysis used a conservative approach in which SOFC system waste heat was not utilized. This means that if waste heat was utilized, the next environmental impact per unit energy produced would be even lower.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, FUEL CELL HDB, VSeventh
[3]  
Bahadori A., 2014, NATURAL GAS PROCESSI, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-099971-5.00010-6
[4]   Addressing temporal considerations in life cycle assessment [J].
Beloin-Saint-Pierre, Didier ;
Albers, Ariane ;
Helias, Arnaud ;
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia ;
Fantke, Peter ;
Levasseur, Annie ;
Benetto, Enrico ;
Benoist, Anthony ;
Collet, Pierre .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 743
[5]  
Bharadwaj SR, 2012, FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS: PREPARATION, PROCESSING AND APPLICATIONS, P639, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-385142-0.00016-7
[6]   Life cycle environmental impact comparison of solid oxide fuel cells fueled by natural gas, hydrogen, ammonia and methanol for combined heat and power generation [J].
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Khalid, Farrukh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (05) :3670-3685
[7]  
Fout T., 2015, NATL ENERGY TECHNOL, V1a, P240
[8]   Results from an industrial size biogas-fed SOFC plant (the DEMOSOFC project) [J].
Gandiglio, Marta ;
Lanzini, Andrea ;
Santarelli, Massimo ;
Acri, Marco ;
Hakala, Tuomas ;
Rautanen, Markus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (08) :5449-5464
[9]   Life Cycle Assessment of a Biogas-Fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Integrated in a Wastewater Treatment Plant [J].
Gandiglio, Marta ;
De Sario, Fabrizio ;
Lanzini, Andrea ;
Bobba, Silvia ;
Santarelli, Massimo ;
Blengini, Gian Andrea .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (09)
[10]  
Goldstein L., 2003, Gas-Fired Distributed Energy Resource Technology Characterizations, NREL/TP-620-34783, P226, DOI DOI 10.2172/15005819