Fault diagnosis methods for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell system

被引:60
作者
Benmouna, A. [1 ]
Becherif, M. [1 ]
Depernet, D. [1 ]
Gustin, F. [2 ]
Ramadan, H. S. [1 ,3 ]
Fukuhara, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bourgogne Franche Compte UTBM, FEMTO ST UMR CNRS 6174, FCLAB FR CNRS 3539, Belfort, France
[2] Univ Franche Comte, Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, FCLAB FR CNRS 3539, Besancon, France
[3] Zagazig Univ, Fac Engn, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
关键词
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell; Fuel cell stack system; Fuel cell faults; Fault diagnosis methods; Model based method; Non-model based method; ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE; WATER MANAGEMENT; MODEL; FLOW; CHANNELS; BEHAVIOR; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.181
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the field of alternative electrical power generation, the durability of the energy presents a great challenge to science. Fuel Cells (FCs) are considered as one of the future promising energy sources. The Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) is more suitable for implementation into daily-use applications. To bring FCs into the market, such technology should have an adequate operation reliability, sufficient lifetime and acceptable cost. Therefore, different problems associated with the faults of FC various components influence the reliability of the system. The issues can be successfully overcome using the diagnostic tools as part of the advanced control system. In this paper, after a short presentation of the FC and its components, the paper emphasizes different faults that may occur. Using the literature, the root causes of these faults are identified. From this point, a state of the art on the recent studies concerning the fault diagnosis method is presented. In order to illustrate the state of the art, a brief experimental study of the impact of anode flooding is given and a signal based diagnostic method is suggested. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1543
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Aitouche A., 2012, IFAC P, V45, P84
[2]  
Aitouche A, 2012, IFAC SAFEPROCESS 8TH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INDICATORS REDUCTION, P1
[4]   Causal and Fault Trees Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Degradation [J].
Brik, Kais ;
Ben Ammar, Faouzi ;
Djerdir, Abdesslam ;
Miraoui, Abdellatif .
JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 12 (05)
[5]   Diagnostic tools for PEMFCs: from conception to implementation [J].
Cadet, C. ;
Jemei, S. ;
Druart, F. ;
Hissel, D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (20) :10613-10626
[6]  
Chapter Angeli C., 2010, DIAGNOSTIC EXPERT SY, V1, P50
[7]   Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell fault diagnosis based on empirical mode decomposition [J].
Damour, Cedric ;
Benne, Michel ;
Grondin-Perez, Brigitte ;
Bessafi, Miloud ;
Hissel, Daniel ;
Chabriat, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2015, 299 :596-603
[8]   Rapid detection of defects in fuel-cell electrodes using infrared reactive-flow-through technique [J].
Das, Prodip K. ;
Weber, Adam Z. ;
Bender, Guido ;
Manak, Austin ;
Bittinat, Daniel ;
Herring, Andrew M. ;
Ulsh, Michael .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2014, 261 :401-411
[9]   Model-based fault diagnosis in PEM fuel cell systems [J].
Escobet, T. ;
Feroldi, D. ;
de Lira, S. ;
Puig, V. ;
Quevedo, J. ;
Riera, J. ;
Serra, M. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2009, 192 (01) :216-223
[10]  
Frappé E, 2010, PROC IEEE INT SYMP, P2029, DOI 10.1109/ISIE.2010.5637474