Examination of optimal embedded PVTs within the BVMT-R in an outpatient clinical sample

被引:24
作者
Olsen, Daniel H. [1 ]
Schroeder, Ryan W. [1 ]
Heinrichs, Robin J. [1 ]
Martin, Phillip K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Wichita, KS 67214 USA
关键词
Brief visuospatial memory test - revised; BVMT-R; performance validity; effort; malingering; PERFORMANCE VALIDITY TESTS; MALINGERING TRIAL 1; DIGIT SPAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGISTS; INDICATORS; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1080/13854046.2018.1501096
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: This study investigated whether indices within the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) could function as embedded performance validity measures in an outpatient clinical sample. Method: A sample of 138 neuropsychological outpatients was utilized; approximately 45% had a known or suspected external incentive. Patients were determined to be valid performers if they passed all criterion performance validity tests (PVTs) and determined to be invalid performers if they failed two or more PVTs. BVMT-R indices met criteria for optimal embedded PVTs if they were not significantly correlated with genuine cognitive dysfunction and if they adequately differentiated the validly from invalidly performing patient groups. Classification accuracy statistics for the indices were then calculated. Supplementary analyses were also calculated for a separate dementia sample. Results: Recognition Hits and Recognition Discrimination were identified as two optimal embedded PVTs for patients without dementia. Recognition Hits showed a sensitivity rate of 41% and a specificity rate of 95%. Recognition Discrimination showed a sensitivity rate of 54% and a specificity rate of 93%. Conclusion: Embedded BVMT-R PVTs are discussed in relation to previous research findings, which were obtained from veteran samples. Recognition Hits and Recognition Discrimination are now validated in a non-veteran clinical sample.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 742
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ADV CLIN SOL ADM SCO
[2]   Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: A Replication Study [J].
Bailey, K. Chase ;
Soble, Jason R. ;
Bain, Kathleen M. ;
Fullen, Chrystal .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 33 (07) :895-900
[3]  
Benedict R. H. B., 1997, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised professional manual
[4]  
Boone K.B., 2018, Textbookof Clinical Neuropsychology, V2nd, P39, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315271743-4, 10.4324/ 9781315271743-4]
[5]  
Boone K.B., 2002, The Dot Counting Test manual
[6]   Symptom validity assessment:: Practice issues and medical necessity -: NAN policy & planning committee [J].
Bush, SS ;
Ruff, RM ;
Tröster, AI ;
Barth, JT ;
Koffler, SP ;
Pliskin, NH ;
Reynolds, CR ;
Silver, CH .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 20 (04) :419-426
[7]   The relationship of IQ to effort test performance [J].
Dean, Andy C. ;
Victor, Tara L. ;
Boone, Kyle B. ;
Arnold, Ginger .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 22 (04) :705-722
[8]   DEMENTIA AND EFFORT TEST PERFORMANCE [J].
Dean, Andy C. ;
Victor, Tara L. ;
Boone, Kyle B. ;
Philpott, Linda M. ;
Hess, Ryan A. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2009, 23 (01) :133-152
[9]   Cost of malingering mild traumatic brain injury-related cognitive deficits during compensation and pension evaluations in the veterans benefits administration [J].
Denning, John H. ;
Shura, Robert D. .
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2019, 26 (01) :1-16
[10]   The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test Performance [J].
Denning, John H. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (04) :417-432