Helping lay carers of people with advanced cancer and their GPs to talk: an exploration of Australian users' views of a simple carer health checklist

被引:13
作者
Burridge, Letitia [1 ]
Mitchell, Geoffrey [1 ]
Jiwa, Moyez [2 ]
Girgis, Afaf [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Level 8,Hlth Sci Bldg, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Melbourne Clin Sch, Sch Med Sydney, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Ctr Oncol Educ & Res Translat CONCERT, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
carer; communication; consultation; general practitioner; qualitative; support; ASSESSMENT TOOL CSNAT; OF-LIFE CARE; NEEDS; HOME; END; CAREGIVERS;
D O I
10.1111/hsc.12312
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The lay caregiving role is integral to advanced cancer care but places carers' health at risk. A supportive General Practitioner (GP) can help primary lay carers manage their health, if they disclose their concerns. A Needs Assessment Tool for Caregivers (NAT-C) was developed for carers to self-complete and use as the basis of a GP consultation, then tested in a randomised controlled trial. This paper reports a qualitative research study to determine the usefulness and acceptability of the NAT-C in the Australian primary care setting. Convenience samples of 11 carers and 5 GPs were interviewed between September 2010 and December 2011 regarding their experiences with and perceptions of the NAT-C. Open-ended questions were used, and the transcripts were analysed qualitatively to identify themes and patterns. Three major themes were identified: (a) Acceptability of the intervention; (b) Impact of the intervention on the GP-patient relationship; and (c) Place of the intervention in advanced cancer care. This simple checklist was acceptable to carers, although some were uncertain about the legitimacy of discussing their own needs with their GP. Carer-patients could not be certain whether a GP would be willing or equipped to conduct a NAT-C-based consultation. Such consultations were acceptable to most GPs, although some already used a holistic approach while others preferred brief symptom-based consultations. Although the NAT-C was acceptable to most carers and GPs, supportive consultations take time. This raises organisational issues to be addressed so carers can seek and benefit from their GP's support.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 365
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A qualitative study exploring the experience of the partners of cancer survivors and their views on the role of primary care [J].
Adams, Eike ;
Boulton, Mary ;
Rose, Peter W. ;
Lund, Susi ;
Richardson, Alison ;
Wilson, Sue ;
Watson, Eila K. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (11) :2785-2794
[2]  
AIHW, 2004, CAR AUSTR ASS FRAIL
[3]  
[Anonymous], AUST J CANC NURS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
[5]  
Aoun S., 2004, The hardest thing we have ever done: The social impact of caring for terminally ill people In Australia
[6]  
BergWeger M, 1995, J SOC SERV RES, V21, P33
[7]  
Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]   Consultation etiquette in general practice: a qualitative study of what makes it different for lay cancer caregivers [J].
Burridge, Letitia H. ;
Mitchell, Geoffrey K. ;
Jiwa, Moyez ;
Girgis, Afaf .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 12
[9]   The cost of health system change: Public discontent in five nations [J].
Donelan, K ;
Blendon, RJ ;
Schoen, C ;
Davis, K ;
Binns, K .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1999, 18 (03) :206-216
[10]   The invisible contract: shifting care from the hospital to the home [J].
Dow, Briony ;
McDonald, John .
AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2007, 31 (02) :193-202