Mapping the Semantic Structure of Cognitive Neuroscience

被引:17
作者
Beam, Elizabeth [1 ]
Appelbaum, L. Gregory [1 ]
Jack, Jordynn [2 ]
Moody, James [1 ]
Huettel, Scott A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
BRAIN; SCIENCE; ABSTRACTS; SET;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_00604
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Cognitive neuroscience, as a discipline, links the biological systems studied by neuroscience to the processing constructs studied by psychology. By mapping these relations throughout the literature of cognitive neuroscience, we visualize the semantic structure of the discipline and point to directions for future research that will advance its integrative goal. For this purpose, network text analyses were applied to an exhaustive corpus of abstracts collected from five major journals over a 30-month period, including every study that used fMRI to investigate psychological processes. From this, we generate network maps that illustrate the relationships among psychological and anatomical terms, along with centrality statistics that guide inferences about network structure. Three terms-prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and anterior cingulate cortex-dominate the net-work structure with their high frequency in the literature and the density of their connections with other neuroanatomical terms. From network statistics, we identify terms that are understudied compared with their importance in the network (e.g., insula and thalamus), are underspecified in the language of the discipline (e.g., terms associated with executive function), or are imperfectly integrated with other concepts (e.g., subdisciplines like decision neuroscience that are disconnected from the main network). Taking these results as the basis for prescriptive recommendations, we conclude that semantic analyses provide useful guidance for cognitive neuroscience as a discipline, both by illustrating systematic biases in the conduct and presentation of research and by identifying directions that may be most productive for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1965
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HARVARD MA ANAL TECH
[2]   Understanding complexity in the human brain [J].
Bassett, Danielle S. ;
Gazzaniga, Michael S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (05) :200-209
[3]   What is the most interesting part of the brain? [J].
Behrens, Timothy E. J. ;
Fox, Peter ;
Laird, Angie ;
Smith, Stephen M. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (01) :2-4
[4]   Can we talk? How the cognitive neuroscience of attention emerged from neurobiology and psychology, 1980-2005 [J].
Bruer, John T. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 83 (03) :751-764
[5]   Understanding information use in a multidisciplinary field: A local citation analysis of neuroscience research [J].
Burright, MA ;
Hahn, TB ;
Antonisse, MJ .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2005, 66 (03) :198-210
[6]  
Carley K.M., 1997, TEXT ANAL SOCIAL SCI, P79
[7]  
Carley K. M., 2010, ORG RISK ANAL VERSIO
[8]  
Carley K. M., 2010, AUTOMAP VERSION 3 0
[9]  
Carley K. M., 2004, CMUISRI04100 CASOS, P1
[10]  
Carley K.M., 2004, CASOS Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-136, P1