Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis

被引:34
作者
Tan, Hon Sen [1 ]
Taylor, Cameron [1 ]
Weikel, Dan [2 ]
Barton, Karen [3 ]
Habib, Ashraf S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Womens Anesthesia, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Biostat & Bioinformat, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Med Ctr Lib & Arch, 10 Searle Dr,3702, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Transversus abdominis plane; Trial sequential analysis; Neuraxial morphine; ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK; EPIDURAL MORPHINE; PAIN; SECTION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) versus controls, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and neuraxial morphine, or when added to neuraxial morphine in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Patients: Parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. Intervention: Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia. Measurements: The primary outcomes were dynamic and static pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h. Secondary outcomes were dynamic and static pain scores and opioid consumption at 6 and 12 h. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed to determine if the results are supported by sufficient data. Main results: Ten studies involving 761 parturients were included. Compared to controls, no difference in dynamic (MD-6; 95%CI-17 to 5) or static (MD-5; 95%CI-14 to 3) pain scores were noted with QLB at 24 h (moderate certainty), although opioid consumption (MD -10.64 mg morphine equivalents; -16.01 to -5.27) was reduced (high certainty), supported by sufficient data. QLB reduced dynamic pain at 6 h, and static pain and opioid consumption at 6 and 12 h compared to controls. Compared to neuraxial morphine, QLB did not alter opioid consumption or pain scores at 24 h (low certainty), although TSA suggests insufficient data. Due to limited data, meta-analysis and TSA were not performed to compare QLB and TAP blocks. Addition of QLB to neuraxial morphine did not alter dynamic and static pain scores at 24 h (moderate certainty, supported by sufficient data) Conclusions: QLB improves post-cesarean delivery analgesia in parturients not receiving neuraxial morphine. Addition of QLB to parturients receiving neuraxial morphine has no significant analgesic benefit. Insufficient data are available to draw firm conclusions of QLB compared to TAP blocks or neuraxial morphine.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, INT J ANESTHESIOL RE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, J HEBAI MED U
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, J PAIN CLIN J
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, J PRACT MED
  • [5] Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Blanco, Rafael
    Ansari, Tarek
    Riad, Waleed
    Shetty, Nanda
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (06) : 757 - 762
  • [6] Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section A randomised controlled trial
    Blanco, Rafael
    Ansari, Tarek
    Girgis, Emad
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 32 (11) : 812 - 818
  • [7] Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses
    Brok, Jesper
    Thorlund, Kristian
    Gluud, Christian
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (08) : 763 - 769
  • [8] Carvalho B, 2017, BEST PRACT RES-CLIN, V31, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003
  • [9] The Future of Cesarean Delivery Rates in the United States
    Clapp, Mark A.
    Barth, William H., Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 60 (04) : 829 - 839
  • [10] Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section
    Dualé, C
    Frey, C
    Bolandard, F
    Barrière, A
    Schoeffler, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (05) : 690 - 694