Fostering meaningful partnerships in public-private partnerships: innovations in partnership design and process management to create value

被引:29
作者
Roberts, David J. [1 ]
Siemiatycki, Matti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Urban Studies Program, Toronto, ON M5S 1J5, Canada
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2015年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
public-private partnership; process management; infrastructure; schools; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1068/c12250
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While public-private partnerships have become increasingly popular for delivering large-scale public infrastructure around the world, a common critique is that the structure of the relationship is typically more akin to contracting out than a truly meaningful collaboration between the partners. In this paper we aim to demonstrate how innovative public-private partnership models can be designed to deepen cooperation and deliver project outcomes that are better than any one partner could achieve on their own. To support our argument, we analyze the case study of a novel partnership between the Toronto District School Board and a condominium developer to redevelop a public high school in Toronto. Our results show that a process management orientation to partnership can build trust between the partners, effectively share project risks, and foster the public support necessary to realize controversial projects.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 793
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Public Works Financing Newsletter, V253, P1
[2]   The struggle for power and control: shifting policy-making models and the Harris agenda for education in Ontario [J].
Bedard, GJ ;
Lawton, SB .
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2000, 43 (03) :241-269
[3]   Transnational public-private partnerships' performance in water governance: institutional design matters [J].
Beisheim, Marianne ;
Campe, Sabine .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2012, 30 (04) :627-642
[4]   Public-private partnerships: from contested concepts to prevalent practice [J].
Bovaird, T .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 70 (02) :199-215
[5]   Public-private partnership: on the edge of project and process management. Insights from Dutch practice: the Sijtwende spatial development project [J].
Edelenbos, Jurian ;
Teisman, Geert R. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2008, 26 (03) :614-626
[6]   PROJECT VERSUS PROCESS MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: RELATION BETWEEN MANAGEMENT STYLE AND OUTCOMES [J].
Edelenbos, Jurian ;
Klijn, Erik-Hans .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 12 (03) :310-331
[7]   Five misunderstandings about case-study research [J].
Flyvbjerg, B .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2006, 12 (02) :219-245
[8]   Public-Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question [J].
Forrer, John ;
Kee, James Edwin ;
Newcomer, Kathryn E. ;
Boyer, Eric .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2010, 70 (03) :475-484
[9]   Are Public Private Partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views [J].
Grimsey, Darrin ;
Lewis, Mervyn K. .
ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2005, 29 (04) :345-378
[10]  
Heald D., 2003, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V16, P342, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513570310482291, 10.1108/09513570310482291]