National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation

被引:31
作者
Morrison, Zoe [1 ]
Fernando, Bernard [1 ]
Kalra, Dipak [2 ]
Cresswell, Kathrin [3 ]
Sheikh, Aziz [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, EHlth Res Grp, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] UCL, Ctr Hlth Informat & Multiprofess Educ, London, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Social Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA USA
关键词
MEDICAL-RECORDS; PATIENT RECORD; SYSTEM; HISTORY; ORGANIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). Materials and methods Qualitative investigation in primary and secondary care and research settings throughout the UK. Data were derived from interviews, expert discussion groups, observations, and relevant documents. Participants (n=70) included patients, healthcare professionals, health service commissioners, policy makers, managers, administrators, systems developers, researchers, and academics. Results Four main themes arose from our data: variations in documentation practice; patient care benefits; secondary uses of information; and informing and involving patients. We observed a lack of guidelines, co-ordination, and dissemination of best practice relating to the design and use of information structures. While we identified immediate benefits for direct care and secondary analysis, many healthcare professionals did not see the relevance of structured and/or coded data to clinical practice. The potential for structured information to increase patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment contrasted with concerns regarding the appropriateness of coded information for patients. Conclusions The design and development of EHRs requires the capture of narrative information to reflect patient/clinician communication and computable data for administration and research purposes. Increased structuring and/or coding of EHRs therefore offers both benefits and risks. Documentation standards within clinical guidelines are likely to encourage comprehensive, accurate processing of data. As data structures may impact upon clinician/patient interactions, new models of documentation may be necessary if EHRs are to be read and authored by patients.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 500
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Understanding implementation: The case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large dutch university medical center [J].
Aarts, J ;
Doorewaard, H ;
Berg, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2004, 11 (03) :207-216
[2]   Successful delivery of information technology in the NHS [J].
Altmann, Paul ;
Michael, Jonathan .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[3]  
Alvesson M., 2000, REFLEXIVE METHODOLOG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, POW INF PUTT ALL US
[5]  
Barbour R., 2008, Introducing qualitative research. A student guide to the craft of doing qualitative research
[6]  
Berg M, 1998, METHOD INFORM MED, V37, P294
[7]   The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview [J].
Black, Ashly D. ;
Car, Josip ;
Pagliari, Claudia ;
Anandan, Chantelle ;
Cresswell, Kathrin ;
Bokun, Tomislav ;
McKinstry, Brian ;
Procter, Rob ;
Majeed, Azeem ;
Sheikh, Aziz .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (01)
[8]   Launching HITECH [J].
Blumenthal, David .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (05) :382-385
[9]   QUALITATIVE RESEARCH .4. QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS IN MEDICAL-RESEARCH [J].
BRITTEN, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (6999) :251-253
[10]  
Butler CC, 1999, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V49, P230