Infraposition of anterior maxillary implant-supported single-tooth restorations in adolescent and adult patients-A prospective follow-up study up to 6 years

被引:6
|
作者
Nilsson, Andree [1 ,2 ]
Johansson, Lars-Ake [1 ,3 ]
Stenport, Victoria F. [2 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [2 ]
Ekfeldt, Anders [4 ]
机构
[1] Halmstad Cty Hosp, Maxillofacial Unit, Div Prosthet Dent, Halmstad, Sweden
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Odontol, Dept Prosthodontics Dent Mat Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Periodontol, Carl Gustavs Vag 34, SE-20506 Malmo, Sweden
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Dent, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent & Oral Funct, Oslo, Norway
关键词
clinical study; complications; dental implants; implant supported crown; infraposition; maxilla; patient satisfaction; ZIRCONIA ABUTMENTS; INCISOR REGION; ADJACENT TEETH; PLACEMENT; GROWTH; CROWNS; PINK;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12818
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background In the maxillary incisor area infraposition of implant restorations can be an esthetic problem. Purpose The aim was to analyze the prevalence of infraposition of single-tooth implant restorations in the anterior maxilla in adolescent and adult patients. Material and Methods The study comprised of 31 patients, 18 women and 13 men, with 39 restorations and with a mean and median age of 23.8 and 18.8 years, range 17.8 to 52.8 years, at the time of implant crown connection. The mean and median time in function for the restorations was 4.5 and 4.3 years respectively with a range of 3.3 to 6.6 years. Results Twenty restorations 51%, showed no signs of infraposition. A slight infraposition (<0.5 mm) was seen in 36% of the restorations. Only in one patient, the observed infraposition of the implant crown was more than 1 mm. We found no significant difference of the observed level of vertical infraposition, Score A (0 mm) and Score B (<0.5 mm), in subjects where the restoration was placed before the age of 20 years compared to the older patients. There were no significant differences in changes of the vertical infraposition when comparing different parameters such as age, gender, jaw relation (Angle-classes I-III), overbite/overjet, occlusal contact on the implant crown, bone augmentation before or at implant installation or if orthodontic treatment of the neighboring teeth had been made before or after the implant installation. Conclusions In the present study, there was a significant yet low correlation between the observed vertical infraposition of the single-tooth implant restoration and the subject's evaluation of the esthetics of the restoration (VAS). Fifty-one percent of the implant-supported crowns, showed no signs of vertical infraposition. A slight infraposition (< 0.5 mm) was however seen in 36% of the restorations. Only one crown showed a vertical infraposition of more than 1 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 959
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implant-supported crowns on maxillary laterals and canines-a long-term follow-up of aesthetics and function
    Sanatnama, Elnaz
    Frantz, Lena
    Ahlin, Erik
    Naoumova, Julia
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (12) : 7545 - 7555
  • [32] Survival Rate of Implants and Mechanical Complications for 64 Implant-Supported Complete-Arch Prostheses in Maxillary Edentulous Patients with a Follow-up of up to 12 Years: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study
    Younes, Ibrahim Abazar
    Able, Francine Badin
    De Moraes, Kely Cristina
    Sartori, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (06) : 823 - 828
  • [33] Survival and Mechanical Complications of Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations Using Prefabricated Titanium Abutments: A Medium- and Long-Term Retrospective Analysis with up to 10 Years Follow-up
    Di Francesco, Fabrizio
    De Marco, Gennaro
    Cristache, Corina M.
    Vernal, Rolando
    Cafferata, Emilio A.
    Lanza, Alessandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (03) : 278 - 286
  • [34] Single-Tooth Implant Restorations in Fresh Extraction Sockets of the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: Two-Year Results of a Prospective Cohort Study
    Ganeles, Jeffrey
    Norkin, Frederic J.
    Zfaz, Samuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 37 (02) : E154 - E162
  • [35] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study
    Vigolo, P
    Givani, A
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (02) : 260 - 265
  • [36] Vertical eruption of anterior maxillary teeth adjacent to single-implant-supported crowns: An assessment after a 3-year follow-up period
    Wittneben, Julia G.
    Igarashi, Kensuke
    Braegger, Urs
    Daniel, Buser
    Schimmel, Martin
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (04) : 605 - 610
  • [37] Limited marginal bone loss in implant-supported fixed full-arch rehabilitations after 5 years of follow-up
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Ravida, Andrea
    Catena, Andres
    O'Valle, Francisco
    Padial-Molina, Miguel
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (12) : 1224 - 1232
  • [38] A prospective clinical evaluation of different single-tooth restoration designs on osseointegrated implants - A 3-year follow-up of Branemark implants
    Wannfors, K
    Smedberg, JI
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (06) : 453 - 458
  • [39] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years
    Schmid, Eric
    Morandini, Michele
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Ramseier, Christoph A.
    Sculean, Anton
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (12) : 1243 - 1252
  • [40] Single implant-supported two-unit cantilever fixed partial dentures in the posterior region: a retrospective case series with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years
    Jensen-Louwerse, Charlotte
    Sikma, Harjan
    Cune, Marco S.
    Gulje, Felix L.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)