Neurocognitive predictors of antidepressant clinical response

被引:61
作者
Bruder, Gerard E. [1 ,2 ]
Alvarenga, Jorge E. [2 ]
Alschuler, Daniel [2 ]
Abraham, Karen [2 ]
Keilp, John G. [1 ,3 ]
Hellerstein, David J. [1 ,4 ]
Stewart, Jonathan W. [1 ,4 ]
McGrath, Patrick J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Div Cognit Neurosci, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Div Mol Imaging & Neuropathol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Depress Evaluat Serv, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Depression; Antidepressants; Treatment response; Neurocognitwe tests; Psychomotor speed; DEPRESSION; DYSFUNCTION; DOPAMINE; NONRESPONSE; FLUOXETINE; BUPROPION; PET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.057
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Executive dysfunction and psychomotor slowing in depressed patients have been associated with poor antidepressant clinical response, but little is known about the value of neurocognitive tests for differential prediction of response. Methods: This report presents new findings for 70 depressed patients tested on neurocogntive tests before receiving treatment with a SSRI (escitalopram or citalopram), NDRI (bupropion) or dual mechanism therapy including a serotonergic agent, and for 57 healthy controls. Results: As predicted from previous research, patients who did not respond to a SSRI or dual therapy showed poorer word fluency than responders, whereas this was not seen for patients treated with bupropion alone. Longer choice reaction time (RT) was also found in nonresponders to a SSRI or dual therapy, but the opposite trend was seen for bupropion. Using a combined index of word fluency and RT (with normative performance as a cutoff) yielded differential predictions of response. Equal to or above normal performance predicted good response to a SSRI or dual therapy, with high positive predictive value (90%) and specificity (78%) but lower sensitivity (53%). In contrast, less than normal performance predicted good response to bupropion alone (positive predictive value=82%; specificity=67%; sensitivity=90%). Limitations: Relatively small sample size, no placebo control, and combining across SSRI alone and dual treatments. Conclusions: Although findings are preliminary due to small sample size, brief tests of word fluency and psychomotor speed may help identify depressed patients who are unresponsive to a serotonergic agent, but who may respond to bupropion alone. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[2]  
Benton A., 1989, MULTILINGUAL APHASIA
[3]   The National Adult Reading Test as a measure of premorbid intelligence: A comparison with estimates derived from demographic variables [J].
Bright, P ;
Jaldow, E ;
Kopelman, MD .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 8 (06) :847-854
[4]  
Bruder GE, 2013, CLINICAL HANDBOOK FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF MOOD DISORDERS, P380
[5]   Executive dysfunction predicts nonresponse to fluoxetine in major depression [J].
Dunkin, JJ ;
Leuchter, AF ;
Cook, IA ;
Kasl-Godley, JE ;
Abrams, M ;
Rosenberg-Thompson, S .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 60 (01) :13-23
[6]   Dopamine and depression - Striatal dopamine D-2 receptor SPECT before and after antidepressant therapy [J].
Ebert, D ;
Feistel, H ;
Loew, T ;
Pirner, A .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 126 (01) :91-94
[7]   Sustained administration of bupropion alters the neuronal activity of serotonin, norepinephrine but not dopamine neurons in the rat brain [J].
El Mansari, Mostafa ;
Ghanbari, Ramez ;
Janssen, Shannon ;
Blier, Pierre .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 55 (07) :1191-1198
[8]  
First M. B., 1996, Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID II)
[9]   A PET STUDY OF WORD FINDING [J].
FRITH, CD ;
FRISTON, KJ ;
LIDDLE, PF ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1991, 29 (12) :1137-1148
[10]  
Galynker II, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P608