Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for COBIT 5 Process Prioritization Completed Research

被引:0
作者
Almeida, Rafael [1 ]
Neto, Joao Souza [2 ]
da Silva, Miguel Mira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Catolica Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
来源
AMCIS 2018 PROCEEDINGS | 2018年
关键词
AHP; COBIT; 5; Goals Cascade; Process Prioritization; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
COB IT 5 is often used as a reference framework by professionals looking for guidelines regarding Information Technology governance and management. One of the management tools provided by CO BIT 5 is the Goals Cascade, which constitutes the core entry point for COBIT 5 process improvement. After the goals cascade run, for each stakeholder need that the stakeholder defines, several processes that support that need should be implemented. Notwithstanding, the goals cascade does not prioritize the processes that should be implemented first, and so, organizations are somehow at a crossroads - they know what to implement, but not where to start. Therefore, in this research, the authors propose to use the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to help organizations establish the priorities for the COBIT 5 improvement processes. The authors carried out a goals cascade run based on the COBIT 5 guide and then prioritized the selected processes using the AHP method.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
  • [2] Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach
    Banaitiene, Nerija
    Banaitis, Audrius
    Kaklauskas, Arturas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (03): : 429 - 441
  • [3] A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications
    Behzadian, Majid
    Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi
    Yazdani, Morteza
    Ignatius, Joshua
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) : 13051 - 13069
  • [4] Bhushan N., 2004, STRATEGIC DECISION M
  • [5] Bouyssou DT., 2000, Evaluation and Decision Model. A Critical Perspective
  • [6] FRAMING THE FRAMEWORKS: A REVIEW OF IT GOVERNANCE RESEARCH
    Brown, Allen E.
    Grant, Gerald G.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 15 : 696 - 712
  • [7] Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP
    Chang, DY
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) : 649 - 655
  • [8] CLELAND D.I., 1983, Systems Analysis and Project Management
  • [9] COLEMAN T, 2011, P PACIFIC ASIA C INF, P00001
  • [10] Daojin Fan, 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (IIS 2010), P487, DOI 10.1109/INDUSIS.2010.5565760