Progesterone levels in letrozole associated controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients

被引:40
|
作者
Goldrat, O. [1 ,2 ]
Gervy, C. [3 ]
Englert, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Delbaere, A. [1 ,2 ]
Demeestere, I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fertil Clin, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Res Lab Human Reprod, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Chem Lab, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
breast cancer; fertility preservation; letrozole; luteal phase; progesterone; WOMEN; GONADOTROPIN; SAFETY; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dev155
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Are progesterone levels after letrozole-associated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients, lower than after standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles? During the luteal phase of letrozole-associated COS cycles (triggered with human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)) progesterone levels are similarly elevated to those obtained after standard COS without letrozole. Current fertility preservation strategies for breast cancer patients include association of COS with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole to harvest several mature oocytes while maintaining low estradiol levels. Data on progesterone levels are however lacking despite growing evidence of the role of progesterone in breast tumorigenesis. This is a prospective observational study comparing estradiol and progesterone levels of 21 breast cancer patients undergoing letrozole-associated COS with 21 infertile patients undergoing standard COS for IVF and/or intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). All patients underwent COS with a GnRH antagonist protocol. In the fertility preservation group, ovulation induction was started in the follicular or luteal phase depending on the chemotherapy schedule and in 10 cases a GnRH antagonist was administered during luteal phase to induce luteolysis. Final oocyte maturation was induced by hCG in all patients. Estradiol and progesterone levels were measured on the day of hCG, at oocyte retrieval, and on days 3 and 8 after oocyte retrieval. Hormone levels in fertility preservation patients were compared with those observed in infertility patients. While estradiol levels were significantly lower in the fertility preservation group compared with the control group (P < 0.001), progesterone levels were similar at all times, including patients receiving a GnRH antagonist during the luteal phase. The studied populations (breast cancer and infertile patients) are different, which may induce selection bias. The small sample size limits the study's statistical power and the possibility to perform multivariate analysis. Recruitment of the study and control patients was completed at the same time; however, enrollment of controls started at a later time. While the use of letrozole in fertility preservation patients has a favorable effect on estrogen levels, no benefit is seen for progesterone levels which are high and comparable with progesterone levels after standard COS in IVF patients. As progesterone has been associated with tumor cell proliferation, caution is mandatory. Modified protocols including GnRH agonist triggering should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:2184 / 2189
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with letrozole for fertility preservation in cancer patients: Case series and review of literature
    Keskin, Ugur
    Ercan, Cihangir Mutlu
    Yilmaz, Ali
    Babacan, Ali
    Korkmaz, Cem
    Duru, Namik Kemal
    Ergun, Ali
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (07) : 830 - 832
  • [42] Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Initiated at Different Phases of the Menstrual Cycle for Fertility Preservation in Oncological Patients: a Retrospective Study
    Baig, A. Santolaria
    Camunas, N. Garcia
    Sanchez, P. Polo
    Nadal, J. Subira
    Fabuel, S. Monzo
    Rubio Rubio, J. M.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (08) : 2547 - 2553
  • [43] Specific protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients
    Cavagna, F.
    Pontes, A.
    Cavagna, M.
    Dzik, A.
    Donadio, N. F.
    Portela, R.
    Nagai, M. T.
    Gebrim, L. H.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : E527 - E532
  • [44] Patients undergoing elective and oncofertility preservation respond similarly to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Frare Kira, Ariane Tieko
    Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro
    de Vasconcelos, Natalia Fontoura
    Colombo, Talita
    Trindade, Vanessa Devens
    Petracco, Alvaro
    Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercilia
    Badalotti, Mariangela
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2022, 26 (03): : 407 - 411
  • [45] Female fertility preservation in cancer patients
    Tomilova, M.
    Fruhaufova, K.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 87 (05): : 356 - 361
  • [46] Fertility preservation options in breast cancer patients
    Kasum, Miro
    von Wolff, Michael
    Franulic, Daniela
    Cehic, Ermin
    Klepac-Pulanic, Tajana
    Oreskovic, Slavko
    Juras, Josip
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (11) : 846 - 851
  • [47] A review of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer
    Ulrich, Nicole D.
    Raja, Nicholas S.
    Moravek, Molly B.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 82 : 60 - 68
  • [48] Fertility preservation with ovarian stimulation and time to treatment in women with stage II-III breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy
    Chien, A. Jo
    Chambers, Julia
    Mcauley, Fiona
    Kaplan, Tessa
    Letourneau, Joseph
    Hwang, Jimmy
    Kim, Mi-Ok
    Melisko, Michelle E.
    Rugo, Hope S.
    Esserman, Laura J.
    Rosen, Mitchell P.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 165 (01) : 151 - 159
  • [49] The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review
    Rodgers, Rachael J.
    Reid, Geoffrey D.
    Koch, Juliette
    Deans, Rebecca
    Ledger, William L.
    Friedlander, Michael
    Gilchrist, Robert B.
    Walters, Kirsty A.
    Abbott, Jason A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (05) : 1033 - 1045
  • [50] Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles
    Jacques Balayla
    Togas Tulandi
    William Buckett
    Hananel Holzer
    Naama Steiner
    Guy Shrem
    Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020, 37 : 913 - 921