Applicability of proximal humeral epiphysis ossification for forensic age estimation according to the Vieth method: a 3.0 T MRI study

被引:0
作者
Altinsoy, Hasan Baki [1 ]
Gurses, Murat Serdar [2 ]
机构
[1] Duzce Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Duzce, Turkey
[2] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Forens Med, Sakarya, Turkey
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Shoulder joint; Forensic medicine; Age estimation by skeleton; Retrospective study; MEDIAL CLAVICULAR EPIPHYSIS; SKELETAL MATURATION; LIVING INDIVIDUALS; MEDICINE; PITFALLS; LIMIT;
D O I
10.1007/s00194-021-00459-8
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
A retrospective study was conducted to explore the possibility of determining the age of majority via examination of the proximal humeral epiphyseal-diaphyseal fusion by 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the Vieth classification. Proximal humeral epiphyses were retrospectively studied on 3.0 T MRI in 315 participants (122 females, 193 males) between 10 and 28 years of age, using T1-weighted turbo spin echo (T1W TSE) and proton density fat-saturated TSE sequence (PD FS TSE). A 5-stage scoring system was used following the method of Vieth et al. The relevant statistics were defined, the intraobserver and interobserver agreements were determined (Cohen's kappa) and the differences between the sexes were analyzed (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05, exact, two-sided). According to this study, stage 5 and stage 6 made it possible to correctly assess the majority in both sexes by examination of the epiphyses of the shoulder joint. The kappa statistics were a good level of agreement for the interobserver and intraobserver evaluations of the shoulder. There were no significant age differences between males and females in any of the stages (all p-values > 0.05). The Vieth classification provides important information in determining whether a person has reached the age of 18 years or not in both sexes through 3.0 T MRI of the shoulder joint.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 35
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Alatas O., 2018, AUST J FORENSIC SCI, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Human Development Reports
[3]  
Black Sue., 2010, AGE ESTIMATION LIVIN, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470669785
[4]   Comparison of the three age estimation methods: Which is more reliable for Turkish children? [J].
Bueken, Bora ;
Erzengin, Oemer Utku ;
Bueken, Erhan ;
Safak, Alp Alper ;
Yazici, Burhan ;
Erkol, Zerrin .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 183 (1-3) :103.e1-103.e7
[5]   The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: A review [J].
Cunha, E. ;
Baccino, E. ;
Martrille, L. ;
Ramsthaler, F. ;
Prieto, J. ;
Schuliar, Y. ;
Lynnerup, N. ;
Cattaneo, C. .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 193 (1-3) :1-13
[6]   Staging Clavicular Development on MRI: Pitfalls and Suggestions for Age Estimation [J].
De Tobel, Jannick ;
Hillewig, Elke ;
van Wijk, Mayonne ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
de Haas, Michiel Bart ;
van Rijn, Rick R. ;
Thevissen, Patrick Werner ;
Verstraete, Koenraad Luc .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (02) :377-388
[7]   Forensic age estimation based on T1 SE and VIBE wrist MRI: do a one-fits-all staging technique and age estimation model apply? [J].
De Tobel, Jannick ;
Hillewig, Elke ;
de Haas, Michiel Bart ;
Van Eeckhout, Bram ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
Thevissen, Patrick Werner ;
Verstraete, Koenraad Luc .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) :2924-2935
[8]   Age assessment by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: A preliminary study [J].
Dedouit, Fabrice ;
Auriol, Julien ;
Rousseau, Herve ;
Rouge, Daniel ;
Crubezy, Eric ;
Telmon, Norbert .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 217 (1-3) :232.e1-232.e7
[9]   Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players [J].
Dvorak, Jiri ;
George, John ;
Junge, Astrid ;
Hodler, Juerg .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 41 (01) :45-52
[10]   Forensic age diagnostics by magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal humeral epiphysis [J].
Ekizoglu, Oguzhan ;
Inci, Ercan ;
Ors, Suna ;
Hocaoglu, Elif ;
Can, Ismail Ozgur ;
Basa, Can Doruk ;
Kacmaz, Ismail Eralp ;
Kranioti, Elena F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2019, 133 (01) :249-256