Differences in central and non-central keratoconus, and their effect on the objective screening thresholds for keratoconus

被引:15
作者
Prakash, Gaurav [1 ]
Srivastava, Dhruv [1 ]
Choudhuri, Sounak [1 ]
Thirumalai, Sandeep Mark [1 ]
Bacero, Ruthchel [1 ]
机构
[1] New Med Ctr Specialty Hosp, NMC Eye Care, Dept Cornea & Refract Surg, Elect St,POB 6222, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
keratconus; pachymetry; referral guidelines; senstivity; topography; wavefront; COLLAGEN CROSS-LINKING; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; CONE LOCATION; CORNEAL; VIDEOKERATOGRAPHY; ABERRATIONS; TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/aos.12899
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the differences in central and non-central keratoconus (based on cone location), and their effect on the objective screening thresholds for keratoconus. Methods: This comparative case series was performed at tertiary care cornea and refractive surgery service. Three groups were made: KC apex within central 2 mm (central keratoconus, n = 50), apex outside central 2mm (non-central keratoconus, n = 50) and normal controls (n = 100, with 50 cases each with apex within and outside central 2 mm). All cases underwent clinical evaluation and corneal topography (CSO, Sirius, Italy). Apex keratometry (ApexK), simulated keratometry at 3 mm (SimK), central corneal thickness (CCT) and minimum corneal thickness (MCT), anterior corneal higher-order aberrations root mean square (HOARMS), and Zernike's coefficients up to fourth order at different zones were measured. Results: In spite of the keratoconic groups having comparable ApexK (p > 0.05), central keratoconus had higher SimK and thinner CCT and MCT (p < 0.001). HOARMS was significantly more for central keratoconus at 3 mm zones. These findings had moderate to large effect size (Cohen's d). Receiver operating curve analysis was carried out to compare central keratoconus and non-central keratoconus with control group. ApexK and HOARMS had best discriminative parameters. Using single parametric suspicion cut-offs of 'either SimK steep > 47.2 D or CCT < 491.6 mu' had a good sensitivity (0.98) for central keratoconus, but not for non-central keratoconus (0.80). Changing this cut-off to 'either SimK steep K >= 45.8 D or CCT <= 503 mu' gave a sensitivity and specificity of 0.95 and 0.87 for non-central keratoconus and 0.99 and 0.87 for central keratoconus. Conclusion: Non-central keratoconus has lesser effect on SimK, pachymetry and smaller-aperture HOARMS. Using 'SimK steep > 47.2 D or CCT < 491.6 mu' may miss timely referral for topography in many of these cases. Using more stringent criteria of SimK steep K >= 45.8 D or CCT <= 503 mu to get a corneal topography done to rule out keratoconus is recommended, especially in cohorts with higher risk.
引用
收藏
页码:E118 / E129
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Alió JL, 2006, J REFRACT SURG, V22, P539
  • [2] Keratoconus-integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal astigmatism, and corneal biomechanics
    Alio, Jorge L.
    Pinero, David P.
    Aleson, Alicia
    Teus, Miguel A.
    Barraquer, Rafael I.
    Murta, Joaquim
    Maldonado, Miguel J.
    Castro de Luna, Gracia
    Gutierrez, Ramon
    Villa, Cesar
    Uceda-Montanes, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (03) : 552 - 568
  • [3] Novel Pachymetric Parameters Based on Corneal Tomography for Diagnosing Keratoconus
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    Caiado, Ana Laura C.
    Guerra, Frederico P.
    Louzada, Ricardo
    Roy, Abhijit Sinha
    Luz, Allan
    Dupps, William J.
    Belin, Michael W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (10) : 753 - 758
  • [4] American Academy of Ophthalmology Cornea/ External Disease Panel, 2013, PREF PRACT PAT GUID
  • [5] American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns Committee, 2010, PREF PRACT PATT GUID
  • [6] Use of a Support Vector Machine for Keratoconus and Subclinical Keratoconus Detection by Topographic and Tomographic Data
    Arbelaez, Maria Clara
    Versaci, Francesco
    Vestri, Gabriele
    Barboni, Piero
    Savini, Giacomo
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (11) : 2231 - 2238
  • [7] When to use the Bonferroni correction
    Armstrong, Richard A.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (05) : 502 - 508
  • [8] Peripheral Ocular Aberrations in Mild and Moderate Keratoconus
    Atchison, David A.
    Mathur, Ankit
    Read, Scott A.
    Walker, Mitchell I.
    Newman, Alexander R.
    Tanos, Photios P.
    McLennan, Roderick T.
    Tran, Andrew H.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (12) : 6850 - 6857
  • [9] Keratoconus evaluation using the Orbscan Topography System
    Auffarth, GU
    Wang, L
    Völcker, HE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (02) : 222 - 228
  • [10] Ethnic Differences of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study
    Chua, Jacqueline
    Tham, Yih Chung
    Liao, Jiemin
    Zheng, Yingfeng
    Aung, Tin
    Wong, Tien Yin
    Cheng, Ching-Yu
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 121 (10) : 2013 - 2022