Dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery - risk factors

被引:1
|
作者
Odeh, Marwan [1 ,2 ]
Karwani, Rawan [2 ]
Schnaider, Oleg [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Maya [1 ,2 ]
Bornstein, Jacob [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Galilee Med Ctr, POB 21, IL-22100 Nahariyya, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Safed, Israel
关键词
cesarean scar dehiscence; augmentation of labor; active phase of labor; scar pain; cesarean section; UTERINE DEHISCENCE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; LABOR; TRIAL; WOMEN; INDUCTION; DEFECTS; RUPTURE; CLOSURE; LAYER;
D O I
10.5603/GP.2020.0086
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We wanted to identify risk factors for dehiscence of cesarean section (CS) scars in patients undergoing repeated cesarean section. Material and methods:This was a retrospective case-control study over a 3-year period in our medical center (2011-2014), comparing women who had repeated CS without complications and women diagnosed with dehiscence. Data were collected from medical records and the groups were compared for demographic and obstetrical data. Results: Dehiscence was identified in 27 women, while 54 women without dehiscence were the control group. Statistically significant differences were found in the need for augmentation, the number of previous cesarean sections, cesarean section in the active phase of labor and length of hospitalization. Discussion: The need for augmentation of labor, CS in the nonactive stage and more than one cesarean section, all increased the risk of dehiscence.There was no association between dehiscence and scar pain, time elapsed since the previous cesarean section, the method of wound closure or fever.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 543
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cesarean section scar ectopic pregnancy: a clinical case series
    Rheinboldt M.
    Osborn D.
    Delproposto Z.
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2015, 18 (2) : 191 - 195
  • [32] Risk factors associated with cesarean section and adverse fetal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Kong, Chengcai
    Zhu, Zonghao
    Mei, Fenglin
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [33] Predictors of successful vaginal delivery following cesarean section
    Rondon-Tapia, Martha
    Torres-Cepeda, Duly
    Mejia-Montilla, Jorly
    Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia
    Fernandez-Ramirez, Andreina
    La Rotta-Nunez, Elisabeth
    Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2023, 69 (01):
  • [34] Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study
    Michal Pomorski
    Tomasz Fuchs
    Mariusz Zimmer
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [35] Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Bhusal Miluna
    Wei Hua
    易村犍
    长江大学学报(自科版), 2013, 10 (36) : 141 - 146
  • [36] Teenage pregnancy: analysis of risk factors for low birth weight, prematurity and cesarean delivery
    de Almeida Cruz Santos, Nilma Lazara
    Oliveira Costa, Maria Conceicao
    Reis Amaral, Magali Teresopolis
    Vieira, Graciete Oliveira
    Bacelar, Eloisa Barreto
    do Vale de Almeida, Andre Henrique
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2014, 19 (03): : 719 - 726
  • [37] Vaginal delivery or cesarean section at term breech delivery - chance or risk?
    Babovic, Ivana
    Arandjelovic, Milica
    Plesinac, Snezana
    Sparic, Radmila
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (12) : 1930 - 1934
  • [38] Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Salguero-Sanchez, Jefferson
    Lucero-Hernandez, Lizeth Dayana
    Arturo-Abadia, Juan Sebastian
    DUAZARY, 2025, 22 (01)
  • [39] Psychosocial risk factors for emergency cesarean section
    Takacs, L.
    Seidlerova, Mlikova J.
    Cepicky, P.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 84 (01): : 33 - 39
  • [40] Pregnancy, Delivery, and Neonatal Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer in Patient with Previous Cesarean Scar
    Zhang, Ningyuan
    Chen, Hua
    Xu, Zhipeng
    Wang, Bin
    Sun, Haixiang
    Hu, Yali
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2016, 22 : 3288 - 3295