Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study

被引:51
|
作者
Bates-Jensen, Barbara M. [1 ,2 ]
McCreath, Heather E. [2 ]
Harputlu, Deniz [3 ]
Patlan, Anabel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Sch Nursing, 5-234 Factor Bldg,700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Geriatr, 5-234 Factor Bldg,700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Ankara Univ, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
HUMAN SKIN; DESIGN-R; SCALE; VALIDITY; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION; VETERANS; THERAPY; RISK; HEEL;
D O I
10.1111/wrr.12714
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) is used to assess wound healing in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BWAT use among nursing home residents with pressure injury. Findings and reliability estimates from the BWAT related to pressure injury characteristics (stage, anatomic location) and natural history (resolved, persisted) among 142 ethnically and racially diverse residents are reported. In this prospective 16-week study, 305 pressure injuries among 142 participants (34% prevalence) are described by stage, anatomic location, and BWAT scores. Visual and subepidermal moisture assessments were obtained from sacrum, buttock, ischial, and heel ulcers weekly. Participants were 14% Asian, 28% Black, 18% Hispanic, 40% White with a mean age of 78 +/- 14 years, and were 62% female; 80% functionally dependent (bed mobility extensive/total assistance) and at risk (Braden Scale score 14 +/- 2.7). The reliability coefficient for BWAT score (all participants, all anatomic locations) was high (r = 0.90; p < 0.0001; n = 1,161 observations). Weighted Kappas for characteristics ranging from 0.46 (skin color surrounding wound) to 0.79 (undermining) were consistent for all participants. BWAT scores showed strongest agreement coefficients for stage 4 pressure injury (r = 0.69), pressure injuries among Asian and White ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.89, and r = 0.91, respectively), and sacrum anatomic location (r = 0.92) indicating scores are better correlated to fair skin tones. Lower agreement coefficients were demonstrated for stage 2 pressure injury (r = 0.38) and pressure injuries among African American and Hispanic ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). BWAT scores were significantly different by pressure injury stage (F = 496.7, df = 6, p < 0.001) and anatomic location (F = 33.76, df = 8, p < 0.001). BWAT score correlated with pressure injury natural history (ulcer resolved 18.4 +/- 7.4, ulcer persisted 24.9 +/- 10.0; F = 70.11, df = 2, p < 0.001), but not with comorbidities. The BWAT provides reliable, objective data for assessing pressure injury healing progress.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nurses' barriers to the pressure ulcer risk assessment scales implementation: A phenomenological study
    Tomas, Nestor
    Mandume, Annalisa M.
    NURSING OPEN, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [32] The Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS): an assessment of validity using Rasch analysis
    Higgins, Johanne
    Laramee, Marie-Therese
    Harrison, Kate Rousseau
    Delparte, Jude J.
    Scovil, Carol Y.
    Flett, Heather M.
    Burns, Anthony S.
    SPINAL CORD, 2019, 57 (10) : 874 - 880
  • [33] Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units
    Efteli, Elcin
    Gunes, Ulku
    WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2020, 66 (02) : 24 - 33
  • [34] Validity and reliability of a pressure ulcer monitoring tool for persons with spinal cord impairment
    Thomason, Susan S.
    Luther, Stephen L.
    Powell-Cope, Gail M.
    Harrow, Jeffrey J.
    Palacios, Polly
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2014, 37 (03) : 317 - 327
  • [35] Braden Scales for Pressure Injury Risk Assessment
    Delmore, Barbara A.
    Ayello, Elizabeth A.
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2023, 36 (06) : 332 - 335
  • [36] A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity
    Lindgren, M
    Unosson, M
    Krantz, AM
    Ek, AC
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2002, 38 (02) : 190 - 199
  • [37] Evaluating self-reported pressure ulcer prevention measures in persons with spinal cord injury using the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist: reliability study
    A Gélis
    J P Daures
    C Benaim
    P Kennedy
    T Albert
    D Colin
    P-A Joseph
    J Pelissier
    C Fattal
    Spinal Cord, 2011, 49 : 653 - 658
  • [38] "What pressure ulcers mean to me? " Representations of pressure ulcer in persons with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study
    Gourlan, Mathieu
    Pellechia, Alessandra
    Robineau, Sandrine
    Foulon, Bernard
    Gault, Dominique
    Lefort, Marc
    Goossens, David
    Mathieu, Sarah
    Laffont, Isabelle
    Dupeyron, Arnaud
    Ninot, Gregory
    Gelis, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2020, 29 (04) : 324 - 330
  • [39] The QardioArm App in the Assessment of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: Reliability and Validity Study
    Mazoteras Pardo, Victoria
    Losa Iglesias, Marta E.
    Lopez Chicharro, Jose
    de Bengoa Vallejo, Ricardo Becerro
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (12):
  • [40] Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome
    Kramer, Andreas H.
    Couillard, Philippe L.
    Zygun, David A.
    Aries, Marcel J.
    Gallagher, Clare N.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2019, 30 (01) : 51 - 61