Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study

被引:51
|
作者
Bates-Jensen, Barbara M. [1 ,2 ]
McCreath, Heather E. [2 ]
Harputlu, Deniz [3 ]
Patlan, Anabel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Sch Nursing, 5-234 Factor Bldg,700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Geriatr, 5-234 Factor Bldg,700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Ankara Univ, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
HUMAN SKIN; DESIGN-R; SCALE; VALIDITY; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION; VETERANS; THERAPY; RISK; HEEL;
D O I
10.1111/wrr.12714
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) is used to assess wound healing in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BWAT use among nursing home residents with pressure injury. Findings and reliability estimates from the BWAT related to pressure injury characteristics (stage, anatomic location) and natural history (resolved, persisted) among 142 ethnically and racially diverse residents are reported. In this prospective 16-week study, 305 pressure injuries among 142 participants (34% prevalence) are described by stage, anatomic location, and BWAT scores. Visual and subepidermal moisture assessments were obtained from sacrum, buttock, ischial, and heel ulcers weekly. Participants were 14% Asian, 28% Black, 18% Hispanic, 40% White with a mean age of 78 +/- 14 years, and were 62% female; 80% functionally dependent (bed mobility extensive/total assistance) and at risk (Braden Scale score 14 +/- 2.7). The reliability coefficient for BWAT score (all participants, all anatomic locations) was high (r = 0.90; p < 0.0001; n = 1,161 observations). Weighted Kappas for characteristics ranging from 0.46 (skin color surrounding wound) to 0.79 (undermining) were consistent for all participants. BWAT scores showed strongest agreement coefficients for stage 4 pressure injury (r = 0.69), pressure injuries among Asian and White ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.89, and r = 0.91, respectively), and sacrum anatomic location (r = 0.92) indicating scores are better correlated to fair skin tones. Lower agreement coefficients were demonstrated for stage 2 pressure injury (r = 0.38) and pressure injuries among African American and Hispanic ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). BWAT scores were significantly different by pressure injury stage (F = 496.7, df = 6, p < 0.001) and anatomic location (F = 33.76, df = 8, p < 0.001). BWAT score correlated with pressure injury natural history (ulcer resolved 18.4 +/- 7.4, ulcer persisted 24.9 +/- 10.0; F = 70.11, df = 2, p < 0.001), but not with comorbidities. The BWAT provides reliable, objective data for assessing pressure injury healing progress.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating self-reported pressure ulcer prevention measures in persons with spinal cord injury using the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist: reliability study
    Gelis, A.
    Daures, J. P.
    Benaim, C.
    Kennedy, P.
    Albert, T.
    Colin, D.
    Joseph, P-A
    Pelissier, J.
    Fattal, C.
    SPINAL CORD, 2011, 49 (05) : 653 - 658
  • [22] Nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool
    Wu, Jing
    Wang, Bangjun
    Zhu, Liping
    Jia, Xiaoli
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [23] Comparison of pressure injury risk assessment outcomes using a structured assessment tool versus clinical judgement: A systematic review
    Lovegrove, Josephine
    Ven, Saroeun
    Miles, Sandra J.
    Fulbrook, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (9-10) : 1674 - 1690
  • [24] Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2.0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention
    Manderlier, Benedicte
    Van Damme, Nele
    Vanderwee, Katrien
    Verhaeghe, Sofie
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Beeckman, Dimitri
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (06) : 1041 - 1051
  • [25] Evaluation of the Nursing Culture Assessment Tool for Pressure Injury Prevention: A Mixed-methods Study
    Yap, Tracey L.
    Kennerly, Susan M.
    Mummert, Kelsey
    WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2019, 65 (12) : 32 - 40
  • [26] Lifestyle Changes and Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury in the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Study Lifestyle Intervention
    Ghaisas, Samruddhi
    Pyatak, Elizabeth A.
    Blanche, Erna
    Blanchard, Jeanine
    Clark, Florence
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2015, 69 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [27] An eHealth System for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Based on Accelerometer and Pressure Data
    Hayn, Dieter
    Falgenhauer, Markus
    Morak, Juergen
    Wipfler, Karin
    Willner, Viktoria
    Liebhart, Walter
    Schreier, Guenter
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2015, 2015
  • [28] Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention for the Family Physician
    Low, Lian Leng
    Vasanwala, Farhad Fakhrudin
    Tay, Ai Choo
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2014, 23 (02) : 142 - 148
  • [29] Reliability and validity of the Munro Scale on the assessment of pressure ulcer risks in adult perioperative patients: a cross-sectional study
    Li, Dongxue
    Tang, Jia
    Gan, Xiuni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (09): : 9811 - 9818
  • [30] Inter-Rater Reliability of a Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for Home Care: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
    Kohta, Masushi
    Ohura, Takehiko
    Tsukada, Kunio
    Nakamura, Yoshinori
    Sukegawa, Mishiho
    Kumagai, Eiko
    Kameda, Yuki
    Kitte, Toshihiro
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2020, 13 : 2031 - 2041