Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study

被引:51
|
作者
Bates-Jensen, Barbara M. [1 ,2 ]
McCreath, Heather E. [2 ]
Harputlu, Deniz [3 ]
Patlan, Anabel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Sch Nursing, 5-234 Factor Bldg,700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Geriatr, 5-234 Factor Bldg,700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Ankara Univ, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
HUMAN SKIN; DESIGN-R; SCALE; VALIDITY; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION; VETERANS; THERAPY; RISK; HEEL;
D O I
10.1111/wrr.12714
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) is used to assess wound healing in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BWAT use among nursing home residents with pressure injury. Findings and reliability estimates from the BWAT related to pressure injury characteristics (stage, anatomic location) and natural history (resolved, persisted) among 142 ethnically and racially diverse residents are reported. In this prospective 16-week study, 305 pressure injuries among 142 participants (34% prevalence) are described by stage, anatomic location, and BWAT scores. Visual and subepidermal moisture assessments were obtained from sacrum, buttock, ischial, and heel ulcers weekly. Participants were 14% Asian, 28% Black, 18% Hispanic, 40% White with a mean age of 78 +/- 14 years, and were 62% female; 80% functionally dependent (bed mobility extensive/total assistance) and at risk (Braden Scale score 14 +/- 2.7). The reliability coefficient for BWAT score (all participants, all anatomic locations) was high (r = 0.90; p < 0.0001; n = 1,161 observations). Weighted Kappas for characteristics ranging from 0.46 (skin color surrounding wound) to 0.79 (undermining) were consistent for all participants. BWAT scores showed strongest agreement coefficients for stage 4 pressure injury (r = 0.69), pressure injuries among Asian and White ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.89, and r = 0.91, respectively), and sacrum anatomic location (r = 0.92) indicating scores are better correlated to fair skin tones. Lower agreement coefficients were demonstrated for stage 2 pressure injury (r = 0.38) and pressure injuries among African American and Hispanic ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). BWAT scores were significantly different by pressure injury stage (F = 496.7, df = 6, p < 0.001) and anatomic location (F = 33.76, df = 8, p < 0.001). BWAT score correlated with pressure injury natural history (ulcer resolved 18.4 +/- 7.4, ulcer persisted 24.9 +/- 10.0; F = 70.11, df = 2, p < 0.001), but not with comorbidities. The BWAT provides reliable, objective data for assessing pressure injury healing progress.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool
    Yamamoto-Kon, Aya
    Fukahori, Hiroki
    Ogata, Yasuko
    Nagano, Midori
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2021, 30 (04) : 566 - 570
  • [2] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0
    Ursavas, Figen Erol
    Bayrak, Damla
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2021, 30 (04) : 582 - 587
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0)
    Dalli, Oznur Erbay
    Yildirim, Yasemin
    CaliSkan, Gulbahar
    Girgin, Nermin Kelebek
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2022, 31 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [4] Psychometric validation of the Korean Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool
    Ryu, Jung Mi
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    Kim, Jung Yoon
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2023, 32 (03) : 172 - 181
  • [5] mHealth App for Pressure Ulcer Wound Assessment in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Validation Study
    Do Khac, Ariane
    Jourdan, Claire
    Fazilleau, Sylvain
    Palayer, Claire
    Laffont, Isabelle
    Dupeyron, Arnaud
    Verdun, Stephane
    Gelis, Anthony
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (02):
  • [6] The theory and practice of pressure ulcer/injury risk assessment: a critical discussion
    Kottner, Jan
    Coleman, Susanne
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2023, 32 (09) : 560 - 569
  • [7] Financial Impact of Improved Pressure Ulcer Staging in the Acute Hospital with Use of a New Tool, the NE1 Wound Assessment Tool
    Young, Daniel L.
    Shen, Jay J.
    Estocado, Nancy
    Landers, Merrill R.
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2012, 25 (04) : 158 - 166
  • [8] Development and validation of a pressure ulcer risk assessment tool for acute hospital patients
    Page, Karen Nicola
    Barker, Anna Lucia
    Kamar, Jeannette
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2011, 19 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [9] Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T)
    Coleman, Susanne
    Smith, Isabelle L.
    McGinnis, Elizabeth
    Keen, Justin
    Muir, Delia
    Wilson, Lyn
    Stubbs, Nikki
    Dealey, Carol
    Brown, Sarah
    Nelson, E. Andrea
    Nixon, Jane
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (02) : 407 - 424
  • [10] Nurses' knowledge on pressure injury prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool
    Dalvand, Sahar
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Gheshlagh, Reza Ghanei
    CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 11 : 613 - 620