Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins

被引:69
作者
Darke, S. G. [1 ]
Baker, S. J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Bournemouth Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Bournemouth BH7 7DW, Dorset, England
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.5423
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim was to assess the early efficacy and complications of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) in a cohort of patients with varicose veins. Methods: Of 192 consecutive patients referred with varicose veins over 15 months, only 11 chose surgery; the rest underwent UGFS treatment. Polidocanol was foamed 1: 3 with air. Under ultrasound control via butterfly or Seldinger cannulation, 1 per cent foam was injected into superficial veins and 3 per cent foam into saphenous trunks, up to a total volume of 14 ml. Outcome was defined as complete when occlusion of the saphenous trunk and/or over 85 per cent of the varicosities was achieved, and partial closure when less. Results: In 163 legs, complete occlusion occurred after one intervention, a further 32 after a second, and one after a third (overall 91 per cent). Of the remainder, all other legs achieved partial occlusion after up to three interventions, apart from two legs with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, which failed. All 23 legs with small saphenous veins had complete occlusion after one intervention compared with 64 of 97 legs with GSV incompetence (P < 0.010). Occlusion rates were also higher when the GSV was cannulated directly: 56 of 70 versus 8 of 27 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: UGFS achieved early complete occlusion safely in over 90 per cent of legs with varicose veins.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 974
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
SCHADECK M, 1991, Phlebologie, V44, P111
[22]  
SMITH PC, 2002, PHLEBOLOGY, V17, P75
[23]  
Tessari L., 2000, PHLEBOLOGIE, P53
[24]  
VIN F, 1991, Phlebologie, V44, P79
[25]   Comparative study of duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy and duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy for the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency [J].
Yamaki, T ;
Nozaki, M ;
Iwasaka, S .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2004, 30 (05) :718-722