Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Autogenous Bone Interbody Fusion Cage for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Cadaveric Model

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Le [1 ]
Malone, Kyle T. [2 ]
Huang, Hai [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenshan [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [1 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Guangzhou 510150, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] NNI Res Fdn, Las Vegas, NV USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
posterior lumbar interbody fusion; autogenous bone; cage; pedicle screws; DONOR SITE PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; GRAFT; IMPLANT; DESIGN; SPINE; INSTRUMENTATION; STABILIZATION; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000291
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A human cadaveric biomechanical study of a novel, prefabricated autogenous bone interbody fusion (ABIF) cage. Objective. To evaluate the biomechanical properties of the ABIF cage in a single-level construct with and without transpedicular screw and rod fixation. Summary of Background Data. In current practice, posterior lumbar interbody fusion is generally carried out using synthetic interbody spacers or corticocancellous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in combination with posterior instrumentation. However, questions remain concerning the use of synthetic intervertebral implants as well as the morbidity ICBG harvesting. Therefore, ABIF cage has been developed to obviate some of the challenges in conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion instrumentation and to facilitate the fusion process. Methods. Eighteen adult cadaveric lumbosacral (L3-S1) specimens were tested. Test conditions included single lumbosacral segments across (1) intact, (2) decompressed, (3) intervertebral cage alone, and (4) intervertebral cage with bilateral transpedicular fixation. Range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and axial failure load were tested for each condition. Results. The ICBG, polyetheretherketone cage, or ABIF cage alone exhibited a significantly lower (P < 0.05) ROM and NZ than the decompressed spine. In comparison with the intact spine, all 3 test conditions without supplemental fixation were able to decrease ROM and NZ to near intact levels. When stabilized with pedicle screws, the ROM was significantly less and the NZ was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for each group both compared with the intact spine. In axial compression testing, the failure load of polyetheretherketone cage was the highest, with no significant difference between the ICBG and the ABIF cage. Conclusion. These data suggest that the novel ABIF cage can bear the physiological intervertebral peak load, similar to ICBG. When combined with pedicle screw and rod fixation, it exhibits similar biomechanical properties as the polyetheretherketone cage plus posterior instrumentation. Based on the biomechanical properties of ABIF cage, the prospect of these cages in clinical practice is expected.
引用
收藏
页码:E684 / E692
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lumbar interbody fusion: a parametric investigation of a novel cage design with and without posterior instrumentation
    Fabio Galbusera
    Hendrik Schmidt
    Hans-Joachim Wilke
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 455 - 462
  • [42] A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qunhu
    Yuan, Zhen
    Zhou, Min
    Liu, Huan
    Xu, Yong
    Ren, Yongxin
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [43] Definition of cage subsidence in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approach - A systematic review
    Baig, Rehman Ali
    Quiceno, Esteban
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Aguirre, Alexander O.
    Okai, Bernard K.
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Francois, Hendrick B.
    Stockman, Isabelle
    Shah, Shashwat
    Levy, Hannon W.
    Khan, Asham
    Rho, Kyungduk
    Pollina, John
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 133
  • [44] Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches
    Cole C.D.
    McCall T.D.
    Schmidt M.H.
    Dailey A.T.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2009, 2 (2) : 118 - 126
  • [45] Anterior Dislodgement of a Fusion Cage after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Oh, Hyeong Seok
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Hong, Soon-Woo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 54 (02) : 128 - 131
  • [46] Biomechanical Evaluation of the Cross-link Usage and Position in the Single and Multiple Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Han, Lin
    Yang, Haisong
    Li, Yongheng
    Li, Zhiyong
    Ma, Hongdao
    Wang, Chenfeng
    Yuan, Jincan
    Zheng, Luyu
    Chen, Qiang
    Lu, Xuhua
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (10) : 2711 - 2720
  • [47] Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Amorim-Barbosa, Tiago
    Pereira, Catarina
    Catelas, Diogo
    Rodrigues, Claudia
    Costa, Paulo
    Rodrigues-Pinto, Ricardo
    Neves, Pedro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 32 (07) : 1291 - 1299
  • [48] A biomechanical investigation of lumbar interbody fusion techniques
    Umale, Sagar
    Yoganandan, Narayan
    Baisden, Jamie L.
    Choi, Hoon
    Kurpad, Shekar N.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2022, 125
  • [49] Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
    Huang, Shengjia
    Min, Shaoxiong
    Wang, Suwei
    Jin, Anmin
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [50] Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Wang, Hongli
    Chen, Wenjie
    Jiang, Jianyuan
    Lu, Feizhou
    Ma, Xiaosheng
    Xia, Xinlei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17