Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Autogenous Bone Interbody Fusion Cage for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Cadaveric Model

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Le [1 ]
Malone, Kyle T. [2 ]
Huang, Hai [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenshan [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [1 ]
Zhang, Liang [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Guangzhou 510150, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] NNI Res Fdn, Las Vegas, NV USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
posterior lumbar interbody fusion; autogenous bone; cage; pedicle screws; DONOR SITE PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; GRAFT; IMPLANT; DESIGN; SPINE; INSTRUMENTATION; STABILIZATION; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000291
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A human cadaveric biomechanical study of a novel, prefabricated autogenous bone interbody fusion (ABIF) cage. Objective. To evaluate the biomechanical properties of the ABIF cage in a single-level construct with and without transpedicular screw and rod fixation. Summary of Background Data. In current practice, posterior lumbar interbody fusion is generally carried out using synthetic interbody spacers or corticocancellous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in combination with posterior instrumentation. However, questions remain concerning the use of synthetic intervertebral implants as well as the morbidity ICBG harvesting. Therefore, ABIF cage has been developed to obviate some of the challenges in conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion instrumentation and to facilitate the fusion process. Methods. Eighteen adult cadaveric lumbosacral (L3-S1) specimens were tested. Test conditions included single lumbosacral segments across (1) intact, (2) decompressed, (3) intervertebral cage alone, and (4) intervertebral cage with bilateral transpedicular fixation. Range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and axial failure load were tested for each condition. Results. The ICBG, polyetheretherketone cage, or ABIF cage alone exhibited a significantly lower (P < 0.05) ROM and NZ than the decompressed spine. In comparison with the intact spine, all 3 test conditions without supplemental fixation were able to decrease ROM and NZ to near intact levels. When stabilized with pedicle screws, the ROM was significantly less and the NZ was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for each group both compared with the intact spine. In axial compression testing, the failure load of polyetheretherketone cage was the highest, with no significant difference between the ICBG and the ABIF cage. Conclusion. These data suggest that the novel ABIF cage can bear the physiological intervertebral peak load, similar to ICBG. When combined with pedicle screw and rod fixation, it exhibits similar biomechanical properties as the polyetheretherketone cage plus posterior instrumentation. Based on the biomechanical properties of ABIF cage, the prospect of these cages in clinical practice is expected.
引用
收藏
页码:E684 / E692
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Evaluation of an Expandable Cage in Single-Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Bhatia, Nitin N.
    Lee, Kenneth H.
    Bui, Christopher N. H.
    Luna, Mario
    Wahba, George M.
    Lee, Thay Q.
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (02) : E79 - E85
  • [2] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26
  • [3] Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Zhu, Haodong
    Zhong, Weibin
    Zhang, Ping
    Liu, Xiaoming
    Huang, Junming
    Liu, Fatai
    Li, Jian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability
    Sakeb, Najmus
    Ahsan, Kamrul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 47 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [5] Biomechanical evaluation of posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques
    Voor, MJ
    Mehta, S
    Wang, M
    Zhang, YM
    Mahan, J
    Johnson, JR
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1998, 11 (04): : 328 - 334
  • [6] Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Haodong Zhu
    Weibin Zhong
    Ping Zhang
    Xiaoming Liu
    Junming Huang
    Fatai Liu
    Jian Li
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [7] Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study
    Sethi, Anil
    Muzumdar, Aditya M.
    Ingalhalikar, Aditya
    Vaidya, Rahul
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (09) : 863 - 869
  • [8] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage
    Brodke, DS
    Dick, JC
    Kunz, DN
    McCabe, R
    Zdeblick, TA
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [9] Revision of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study in nonosteoporotic bone Laboratory investigation
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Mehbod, Amir
    Fischer, Gustav
    Faundez, Antonio
    Wu, Wentien
    Transfeldt, Ensor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 12 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [10] The Correlation Between Cage Subsidence, Bone Mineral Density, and Clinical Results in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Oh, Kyu Won
    Lee, Jae Hyup
    Lee, Ji-Ho
    Lee, Do-Yoon
    Shim, Hee Jong
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (06): : E683 - E689