MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model

被引:4
|
作者
Cha, Jang Gyu [1 ]
Yoo, Jae Ho [2 ]
Rhee, Sun Jung [3 ]
Hwang, Seung Sik [4 ]
Han, Jong Kyu [5 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Bucheon Hospitial, Dept Radiol, Puchon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Seoul SKY Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Inha Univ, Sch Med, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Inchon, South Korea
[5] Soonchunhyang Univ, Cheonan Hosp, Dept Radiol, Asan, Chungcheongnam, South Korea
关键词
cartilage; Knee joint; MR imaging; MR sequence; animal model; KNEE; SEPARATION; CURVES; WATER;
D O I
10.1177/0284185113497711
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background IDEAL technique is a robust fat-water separation method which is potentially useful in cartilage imaging with significant improvement in the cartilage signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Purpose To identify whether iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) improved diagnostic performance for IDEAL 2D fast spin echo (FSE) and 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) versus fat-saturated (FS) protocols at 1.5 and 3.0 T in the evaluation of patella-femoral cartilage lesions. Material and Methods Forty-six artificial cartilage lesions were created in femoro-patellar articular cartilages of 11 porcine knees. All knees underwent MR examination at 1.5 and 3.0 T with MR protocol consisting of sagittal FS 2D FSE and 3D SPGR and IDEAL 2D FSE and IDEAL 3D SPGR, respectively. Qualitative assessment was performed to compare the diagnostic performance between 1.5- and 3.0-T protocols and between IDEAL and FS protocols. Results IDEAL 3D SPGR had a significantly higher accuracy for detecting partial thickness cartilage lesions (P < 0.01) than FS SPGR protocols, whereas there was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between IDEAL and FS 2D FSE except for one cartilage lesion. For all imaging sequences, no significant difference was observed in the diagnostic performance between 1.5- and 3.0-T imaging protocols (P = 0.42-0.91). Conclusion Compared with conventional FS SPGR imaging, IDEAL 3D SPGR provided a better diagnostic performance for evaluation of porcine knee articular cartilage lesions in the knee joints at 1.5 and 3.0 T. IDEAL 3D SPGR may therefore be useful for detecting partial-thickness cartilage lesions in patients with degenerative osteoarthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 469
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences
    Kornaat, PR
    Reeder, SB
    Koo, S
    Brittain, JH
    Yu, H
    Andriacchi, TP
    Gold, GE
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2005, 13 (04) : 338 - 344
  • [2] High-resolution 3D cartilage Imaging with IDEAL - SPGR at 3 T
    Siepmann, David B.
    McGovern, Jeff
    Brittain, Jean H.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (06) : 1510 - 1515
  • [3] 3D THICKNESS MAPS DERIVED FROM AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION OF KNEE ARTICULAR CARTILAGE AT 1.5 T: A FEASIBILITY STUDY USING 3D FS DESS, 3D PD FS FSE, AND 2D PD FS FSE
    Farber, J. M.
    Tamez-Pena, J.
    Totterman, S.
    Baum, K.
    Schreyer, E.
    Brandser, E.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2014, 22 : S284 - S284
  • [4] Clinical evaluation of fast 3D half-Fourier FSE for T2-weighted female pelvic MR imaging: Comparison of conventional FSE, single-shot 2D and 3D half-Fourier FSE
    Sugimura, H
    Yamaguchi, K
    Tamura, S
    Machida, Y
    Kitane, S
    Asato, M
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 325 - 325
  • [5] MR 3D SPGR、3D FIESTA和2D SE/FSE序列对外伤性膝关节软骨损伤的分级诊断研究
    彭雯佳
    李小明
    艾飞
    余铖
    Kacher Daniel
    吴华
    漆剑频
    夏黎明
    胡道予
    胡军武
    冯定义
    临床放射学杂志, 2009, 28 (10) : 1425 - 1429
  • [6] Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: Preliminary results
    Bazot, M.
    Stivalet, A.
    Darai, E.
    Coudray, C.
    Thomassin-Naggara, I.
    Poncelet, E.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [7] Comparison of 3D FLAIR, 2D FLAIR, and 2D T2-Weighted MR Imaging of Brain Stem Anatomy
    Kitajima, M.
    Hirai, T.
    Shigematsu, Y.
    Uetani, H.
    Iwashita, K.
    Morita, K.
    Komi, M.
    Yamashita, Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (05) : 922 - 927
  • [8] Comparison of T1-weighted 2D TSE, 3D SPGR, and two-point 3D Dixon MRI for automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue at 3 Tesla
    Fallah, Faezeh
    Machann, Juergen
    Martirosian, Petros
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Schick, Fritz
    Yang, Bin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (02) : 139 - 151
  • [9] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248
  • [10] Comparison between 2D FSE T2-weighted Dixon MRI and contrast-enhanced 2D FSE and 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon MRI to quantify inflammation in hands of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis
    Dion, Brice
    Lacrosse, Romain
    Michoux, Nicolas
    Stoenoiu, Maria
    Durez, Patrick
    Lecouvet, Frederic
    Kirchgesner, Thomas
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2023, 104 (7-8) : 351 - 358