FCB estimation with three different PPP models: equivalence analysis and experiment tests

被引:24
作者
Wang, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Guanwen [1 ]
Yang, Yuanxi [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Qin [1 ]
Gao, Yang [2 ]
Xiao, Guorui [5 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Coll Geol Engn & Geomat, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Geomat Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Natl Key Lab Geoinformat Engn, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xian Res Inst Surveying & Mapping, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Geodet Inst, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Precise point positioning; Ionospheric-free combination; Raw observations; FCB; Ambiguity resolution; FRACTIONAL CYCLE BIAS; AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION; GPS;
D O I
10.1007/s10291-019-0887-2
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Precise and reliable fractional cycle bias (FCB) products are critical for ambiguity resolution of precise point positioning (PPP). Three PPP models are usually adopted to generate the FCB products, i.e., the traditional ionospheric-free combined PPP (IF-PPP) model, the uncombined and unconstrained PPP model (UU-PPP) as well as the ionospheric-constrained PPP (IC-PPP) model. Considering that different observation models and ionospheric delay constraints are used, the applicability and interoperability of the obtained FCB products are assessed. We presented the equivalent conversion formulas of different FCB products obtained with different PPP models, which are then converted and compared. The root mean square (RMS) of the wide-lane (WL) FCB differences for IF-UU, IF-IC and UU-IC is 0.021, 0.024 and 0.010 cycles, while the RMS of the narrow-lane FCB differences is 0.028, 0.018 and 0.021 cycles. The precision of the WL FCBs based on the uncombined PPP models is higher than that based on the IF-PPP model since the new WL ambiguities derived from the uncombined ambiguities are free of the pseudorange noise. The equivalence of the FCB products estimated from the three different PPP models is confirmed in theory and by experiment results. To further evaluate the performance of the three PPP models, the positioning accuracy, the convergence time and the ambiguity fixing success rate are calculated using IGS data. The maximum positioning difference is less than 0.9mm among the three PPP models. Compared to the float solutions of the IF-PPP, UU-PPP, IC-PPP with GIM model or with re-injected ionospheric delay corrections, the convergence time is shortened by 38.5%, 46.2%, 50.0% and 87.8% and the positioning accuracy improved by 27.1%, 38.9%, 41.1% and 25.7%, respectively. The ambiguity fixing success rate of the uncombined PPP models is slightly higher than that of the combined model, and fast ambiguity-fixed solution can proceed with high-precise ionospheric delay corrections.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Aggrey J, 2017, I NAVIG SAT DIV INT, P2191
  • [2] Current State of Precise Point Positioning and Future Prospects and Limitations
    Bisnath, S.
    Gao, Y.
    [J]. OBSERVING OUR CHANGING EARTH, 2009, 133 : 615 - +
  • [3] Chen K., 2005, Proceedings of ION GNSS 2005, 13-16 Sep 2005, Long Beach, California, USA, P1514
  • [4] Statistical analysis and quality control for GPS fractional cycle bias and integer recovery clock estimation with raw and combined observation models
    Cheng, Shuyang
    Wang, Jinling
    Peng, Wenjie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2017, 60 (12) : 2648 - 2659
  • [5] Adaptive Point Location in Planar Convex Subdivisions
    Cheng, Siu-Wing
    Lau, Man-Kit
    [J]. ALGORITHMS AND COMPUTATION, ISAAC 2015, 2015, 9472 : 14 - 22
  • [6] Collins P., 2008, Proceedings of ION-GNSS-2008, Savannah, Georgia, USA, September 2008, V16-19, P1315
  • [7] Multi-GNSS real-time clock estimation using sequential least square adjustment with online quality control
    Fu, Wenju
    Huang, Guanwen
    Zhang, Qin
    Gu, Shengfeng
    Ge, Maorong
    Schuh, Harald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2019, 93 (07) : 963 - 976
  • [8] Real-time estimation of BDS/GPS high-rate satellite clock offsets using sequential least squares
    Fu, Wenju
    Yang, Yuanxi
    Zhang, Qin
    Huang, Guanwen
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (02) : 477 - 487
  • [9] Gabor M. J., 1999, P ION GNSS 1999, P1569
  • [10] Gao Y., 2001, Proceedings of ION GPS-2001, P1532