Application of multivariate joint modeling of longitudinal biomarkers and time-to-event data to a rare kidney stone cohort

被引:0
|
作者
Vaughan, Lisa E. E. [1 ]
Lieske, John C. C.
Milliner, Dawn S. S.
Schulte, Phillip J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Harwick 8th Floor CT&B Biostat,200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Joint models; survival analysis; biomarkers; kidney failure; primary hyperoxaluria;
D O I
10.1017/cts.2022.465
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background:Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression is a popular statistical method used in kidney disease research to evaluate associations between biomarkers collected serially over time with progression to kidney failure. Typically, biomarkers of interest are considered time-dependent covariates being updated at each new measurement using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Recently, joint modeling has emerged as a flexible alternative for multivariate longitudinal and time-to-event data. This study describes and demonstrates multivariate joint modeling using as an example the association of serial biomarkers (plasma oxalate [POX] and urinary oxalate [UOX]) and kidney function among patients with primary hyperoxaluria in the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium Registry. Methods:Time-to-kidney failure was regressed on serially measured biomarkers in two ways: time-dependent LOCF Cox proportional hazards regression and multivariate joint models. Results:In time-dependent LOCF Cox regression, higher POX was associated with increased risk of kidney failure (HR = 2.20 per doubling, 95% CI = [1.38-3.51], p < 0.001) whereas UOX was not (HR = 1.08 per doubling, [0.66-1.77], p = 0.77). In multivariate joint models, estimates suggest higher UOX may be associated with lower risk of kidney failure (HR = 0.42 per doubling [0.15-1.04], p = 0.066), though not statistically significant, since impaired urinary excretion of oxalate may reflect worsening kidney function. Conclusions:Multivariate joint modeling is more flexible than LOCF and may better reflect biological plausibility since biomarkers are not steady-state values between measurements. While LOCF is preferred to naive methods not accounting for changes in biomarkers over time, results may not accurately reflect flexible relationships that can be captured with multivariate joint modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Semiparametric normal transformation joint model of multivariate longitudinal and bivariate time-to-event data
    Tang, An-Ming
    Peng, Cheng
    Tang, Niansheng
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (29) : 5491 - 5512
  • [22] Faster Monte Carlo estimation of joint models for time-to-event and multivariate longitudinal data
    Philipson, Pete
    Hickey, Graeme L.
    Crowther, Michael J.
    Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2020, 151
  • [23] A penalized likelihood approach to joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and time-to-event data
    Ye, Wen
    Lin, Xihong
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2008, 1 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [24] Boosting joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Waldmann, Elisabeth
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    Klein, Nadja
    Kneib, Thomas
    Pressler, Tania
    Schmid, Matthias
    Mayr, Andreas
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (06) : 1104 - 1121
  • [25] Joint Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data and Time-to-Event Data
    Takeda, Yuriko
    Misumi, Toshihiro
    Yamamoto, Kouji
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (19)
  • [26] Joint modeling of longitudinal continuous, longitudinal ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes
    Khurshid Alam
    Arnab Maity
    Sanjoy K. Sinha
    Dimitris Rizopoulos
    Abdus Sattar
    Lifetime Data Analysis, 2021, 27 : 64 - 90
  • [27] Joint modeling of longitudinal continuous, longitudinal ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes
    Alam, Khurshid
    Maity, Arnab
    Sinha, Sanjoy K.
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    Sattar, Abdus
    LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2021, 27 (01) : 64 - 90
  • [28] H-likelihood approach for joint modeling of longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data
    Ha, Il Do
    Noh, Maengseok
    Lee, Youngjo
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (06) : 1122 - 1143
  • [29] BAYESIAN JOINT MODELING OF LONGITUDINAL MEASUREMENTS AND TIME-TO-EVENT DATA USING ROBUST DISTRIBUTIONS
    Baghfalaki, T.
    Ganjali, M.
    Hashemi, R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (04) : 834 - 855
  • [30] Joint modeling of zero-inflated longitudinal proportions and time-to-event data with application to a gut microbiome study
    Hu, Jiyuan
    Wang, Chan
    Blaser, Martin J.
    Li, Huilin
    BIOMETRICS, 2022, 78 (04) : 1686 - 1698