Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates:: legislation and official guidelines across Europe

被引:71
作者
McHaffie, HE
Cuttini, M
Brölz-Voit, G
Randag, L
Mousty, R
Duguet, AM
Wennergren, B
Benciolini, P
机构
[1] Ist Linfanzia Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
[2] Arztekammer Nordrhein, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Informat & Complaints Off Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Ministere Sante, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[5] Hop Purpan, Toulouse, France
[6] Univ Padua, I-35100 Padua, Italy
关键词
withdrawing treatment; neonates; comparisons; Europe;
D O I
10.1136/jme.25.6.440
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Representatives from eight European countries compared the legal, ethical and professional settings within which decision making for neonates takes place. When it comes to limiting treatment them is general agreement across all countries that overly aggressive treatment is to be discouraged. Nevertheless, strong emphasis has been placed on the need for compassionate care even where cure is not possible. Where a child will die irrespective of medical intervention, there is widespread acceptance of the practice of limiting aggressive treatment or alleviating suffering even if death may be hastened as a result. where the infant could be saved but the future outlook is bleak there is more debate, but only two countries hare tested the courts with such cases. When it comes to the active intentional ending of life, the legal position is standard across Europe it is prohibited. However, recognising those intractable situations where death may be lingering and unpleasant, Dutch paediatricians have reported that they do sometimes assist babies to die with parental consent. Two cases have been tried through the courts and recent official recommendations have set out standards by which such actions may be assessed.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条