On the Structure of Personality Disorder Traits: Conjoint Analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 Trait Models

被引:219
作者
Wright, Aidan G. C. [1 ]
Simms, Leonard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Psychol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
personality traits; personality disorders; personality pathology; hierarchical trait models; HIGHER-ORDER FACTORS; DIMENSIONAL MODELS; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SUBSTANCE USE; DSM-5; CLASSIFICATION; LINKING; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; DISTINCTIONS; CONVERGENCE;
D O I
10.1037/per0000037
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The current study examines the relations among contemporary models of pathological and normal range personality traits. Specifically, we report on (a) conjoint exploratory factor analyses of the Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder static form (CAT-PD-SF) with the Personality Inventory for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition and NEO Personality Inventory-3 First Half, and (b) unfolding hierarchical analyses of the three measures in a large general psychiatric outpatient sample (n = 628; 64% Female). A five-factor solution provided conceptually coherent alignment among the CAT-PD-SF, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3FH scales. Hierarchical solutions suggested that higher-order factors bear strong resemblance to dimensions that emerge from structural models of psychopathology (e.g., Internalizing and Externalizing spectra). These results demonstrate that the CAT-PD-SF adheres to the consensual structure of broad trait domains at the five-factor level. Additionally, patterns of scale loadings further inform questions of structure and bipolarity of facet and domain level constructs. Finally, hierarchical analyses strengthen the argument for using broad dimensions that span normative and pathological functioning to scaffold a quantitatively derived phenotypic structure of psychopathology to orient future research on explanatory, etiological, and maintenance mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Avoidant personality disorder: Current status and future directions [J].
Alden, LE ;
Laposa, JM ;
Taylor, CT ;
Ryder, AG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2002, 16 (01) :1-29
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[3]   On the Convergence Between PSY-5 Domains and PID-5 Domains and Facets: Implications for Assessment of DSM-5 Personality Traits [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Bagby, R. Michael ;
Quilty, Lena C. ;
Veltri, Carlo O. C. ;
Markon, Kristian E. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (03) :286-294
[4]  
APA, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[5]   THE MALADAPTIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS OF THE PERSONALITY INVENTORY FOR DSM-5 (PID-5) IN RELATION TO THE HEXACO PERSONALITY FACTORS AND SCHIZOTYPY/DISSOCIATION [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom ;
de Vries, Reinout E. ;
Hendrickse, Joshua ;
Born, Marise Ph .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2012, 26 (05) :641-659
[6]   Behaviorally referenced experimentation and symptom validation: A paradigm for 21st-century personality disorder research [J].
Bornstein, RF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2003, 17 (01) :1-18
[7]   An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis [J].
Browne, MW .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2001, 36 (01) :111-150
[8]   Development and Validation of Big Four Personality Scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality-Second Edition (SNAP-2) [J].
Calabrese, William R. ;
Rudick, Monica M. ;
Simms, Leonard J. ;
Clark, Lee Anna .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 24 (03) :751-763
[9]  
Clark L.A., 2008, Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, V3rd, P265
[10]   Personality disorder assessment: The challenge of construct validity [J].
Clark, LA ;
Livesley, WJ ;
Morey, LC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1997, 11 (03) :205-231