Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes

被引:13
|
作者
Ivers, Noah M. [1 ]
Tricco, Andrea C. [2 ]
Taljaard, Monica [3 ]
Halperin, Ilana [4 ]
Turner, Lucy [5 ]
Moher, David [5 ]
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2013年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS; CONSORT STATEMENT; IMPACT; RISK; BIAS; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; EXTENSION; BEHAVIOR; TOOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002727
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Despite the increasing numbers of published trials of quality improvement (QI) interventions in diabetes, little is known about the risk of bias in this literature. Design Secondary analysis of a systematic review. Data sources Medline, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) database (from inception to July 2010) and references of included studies. Eligibility criteria Randomised trials assessing 11 predefined QI strategies or financial incentives targeting health systems, healthcare professionals or patients to improve the management of adult outpatients with diabetes. Analysis Risk of bias (low, unclear or high) was assessed for the 142 trials in the review across nine domains using the EPOC version of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We used Cochran-Armitage tests for trends to evaluate the improvement over time. Results There was no significant improvement over time in any of the risk of bias domains. Attrition bias (loss to follow-up) was the most common source of bias, with 24 trials (17%) having high risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data. Overall, 69 trials (49%) had at least one domain with high risk of bias. Inadequate reporting frequently hampered the risk of bias assessment: allocation sequence was unclear in 82 trials (58%) and allocation concealment was unclear in 78 trials (55%). There were significant reductions neither in the proportions of studies at high risk of bias over time nor in the adequacy of reporting of risk of bias domains. Conclusions Nearly half of the included QI trials in this review were judged to have high risk of bias. Such trials have serious limitations that put the findings in question and therefore inhibit evidence-based QI. There is a need to limit the potential for bias when conducting QI trials and improve the quality of reporting of QI trials so that stakeholders have adequate evidence for implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review of Communication Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients with Advanced and Serious Illness
    Oluwakemi A. Fawole
    Sydney M. Dy
    Renee F. Wilson
    Brandyn D. Lau
    Kathryn A. Martinez
    Colleen C. Apostol
    Daniela Vollenweider
    Eric B. Bass
    Rebecca A. Aslakson
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2013, 28 : 570 - 577
  • [42] Quality Improvement Interventions to Enhance Vaccine Uptake in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
    Kazi, Basil
    Talukdar, Zain
    Schrieffer, Janice
    JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2024, 46 (02) : 81 - 94
  • [43] Quality improvement interventions targeting vaccine uptake in cancer patients: A systematic review
    Kazi, Basil
    Talukdar, Zain
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [44] A Systematic Review of Communication Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients with Advanced and Serious Illness
    Fawole, Oluwakemi A.
    Dy, Sydney M.
    Wilson, Renee F.
    Lau, Brandyn D.
    Martinez, Kathryn A.
    Apostol, Colleen C.
    Vollenweider, Daniela
    Bass, Eric B.
    Aslakson, Rebecca A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (04) : 570 - 577
  • [45] Improving performance in radiation oncology: An international systematic review of quality improvement interventions
    Dodkins, Joanna
    Zachou, Georgia
    Rashid, Adil
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Nossiter, Julie
    Tree, Alison
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2025, 206
  • [46] Quality improvement, implementation, and dissemination strategies to improve mental health care for children and adolescents: a systematic review
    Valerie L. Forman-Hoffman
    Jennifer Cook Middleton
    Joni L. McKeeman
    Leyla F. Stambaugh
    Robert B. Christian
    Bradley N. Gaynes
    Heather Lynne Kane
    Leila C. Kahwati
    Kathleen N. Lohr
    Meera Viswanathan
    Implementation Science, 12
  • [47] Quality improvement, implementation, and dissemination strategies to improve mental health care for children and adolescents: a systematic review
    Forman-Hoffman, Valerie L.
    Middleton, Jennifer Cook
    McKeeman, Joni L.
    Stambaugh, Leyla F.
    Christian, Robert B.
    Gaynes, Bradley N.
    Kane, Heather Lynne
    Kahwati, Leila C.
    Lohr, Kathleen N.
    Viswanathan, Meera
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [48] To RCT or not to RCT? The ongoing saga of randomised trials in quality improvement
    Parry, Gareth
    Power, Maxine
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (04) : 221 - 223
  • [49] Quality assessment of randomised controlled trials in stress urinary incontinence interventions: a systematic review
    Pookarnjanamorakot, P.
    Pergialiotis, V
    Durnea, C.
    Mudiaga, Z.
    Elfituri, A.
    Doumouchtsis, S. K.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 32 - 33
  • [50] Quality of diabetes care in the US needs improvement
    不详
    GERIATRICS-US, 2002, 57 (07): : 15 - 16