Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes

被引:13
|
作者
Ivers, Noah M. [1 ]
Tricco, Andrea C. [2 ]
Taljaard, Monica [3 ]
Halperin, Ilana [4 ]
Turner, Lucy [5 ]
Moher, David [5 ]
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2013年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS; CONSORT STATEMENT; IMPACT; RISK; BIAS; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; EXTENSION; BEHAVIOR; TOOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002727
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Despite the increasing numbers of published trials of quality improvement (QI) interventions in diabetes, little is known about the risk of bias in this literature. Design Secondary analysis of a systematic review. Data sources Medline, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) database (from inception to July 2010) and references of included studies. Eligibility criteria Randomised trials assessing 11 predefined QI strategies or financial incentives targeting health systems, healthcare professionals or patients to improve the management of adult outpatients with diabetes. Analysis Risk of bias (low, unclear or high) was assessed for the 142 trials in the review across nine domains using the EPOC version of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We used Cochran-Armitage tests for trends to evaluate the improvement over time. Results There was no significant improvement over time in any of the risk of bias domains. Attrition bias (loss to follow-up) was the most common source of bias, with 24 trials (17%) having high risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data. Overall, 69 trials (49%) had at least one domain with high risk of bias. Inadequate reporting frequently hampered the risk of bias assessment: allocation sequence was unclear in 82 trials (58%) and allocation concealment was unclear in 78 trials (55%). There were significant reductions neither in the proportions of studies at high risk of bias over time nor in the adequacy of reporting of risk of bias domains. Conclusions Nearly half of the included QI trials in this review were judged to have high risk of bias. Such trials have serious limitations that put the findings in question and therefore inhibit evidence-based QI. There is a need to limit the potential for bias when conducting QI trials and improve the quality of reporting of QI trials so that stakeholders have adequate evidence for implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality Improvement Interventions in Intensive Care Units
    Nagamatsu, Soichiro
    Weinert, Craig R.
    Scales, Damon C.
    Dainty, Katie
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (17): : 1764 - 1765
  • [32] Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Evaluating Quality Improvement Interventions
    Johnson, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 15 (01): : E144 - E147
  • [33] Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care
    Harris, S
    Buchinski, B
    Gryzbowski, S
    Janssen, P
    Mitchell, GWE
    Farquharson, D
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 163 (09) : 1163 - 1166
  • [34] Non-pharmacological interventions in primary care to improve the quality of life of older patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Cardoso, Carlos Seica
    Matos, Joana Rita
    Prazeres, Filipe
    Gomes, Barbara
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [35] Enhancing the potential of quality improvement organizations to improve quality of care
    Shortell, Stephen M.
    Peck, William A.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (05) : 388 - 389
  • [36] Health Care Interventions to Improve the Quality of Diabetes Care in African Americans A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
    Nevot-Cordero, Adela
    Rodriguez-Barranco, Miguel
    Sordo, Luis
    Goncalves, Daniela C.
    DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (03) : 760 - 768
  • [37] Effectiveness and Experiences of Quality Improvement Interventions in Older Adult Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
    Jabin, Md Shafiqur Rahman
    Samuriwo, Ray
    Chilaka, Marcus
    Yaroson, Emilia Vann
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [38] Randomized trial of a quality improvement intervention to improve diabetes care in primary care practices
    O'Connor, PJ
    Solberg, L
    Desai, J
    Rosh, WA
    Reger, LI
    Pearson, T
    Cherney, LM
    Crain, AL
    Asche, SE
    Sperl-Hillen, JM
    Bishop, DB
    DIABETES, 2004, 53 : A551 - A551
  • [39] Randomized trial of quality improvement intervention to improve diabetes care in primary care settings
    O'Connor, PJ
    Desai, J
    Solberg, LI
    Reger, LA
    Crain, AL
    Asche, SE
    Pearson, TL
    Clark, CK
    Rush, WA
    Cherney, LM
    Sperl-Hillen, JM
    Bishop, DB
    DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (08) : 1890 - 1897
  • [40] Can Structured Education Improve Metabolic Outcome and Quality of Life in Diabetes? A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Mohamed, Osama Moheb Ibrahim
    Hassanein, Mohamed
    WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2016, 14 (02): : 33 - 45