Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda

被引:0
作者
Ihli, Hanna Julia [1 ]
Chiputwa, Brian [2 ]
Musshoff, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Goettingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Gottingen, Germany
[2] World Agroforestry Ctr, Res Methods Grp, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
elicitation of risk preferences; inconsistency rates; laboratory experiment in the field; Uganda; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS; EXPECTED UTILITY; FIELD-EXPERIMENT; PROSPECT-THEORY; ATTITUDES; AVERSION; FARMERS; UNCERTAINTY; ECONOMICS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This study compares risk preferences elicited from two different methods and the resulting inconsistency rates in response behavior. We also identify and compare how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence risk preferences elicited from the two methods. We use experimental and survey data collected from 332 randomly selected smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda. We find relatively low inconsistency rates in the response behavior and that both methods classify most farmers as risk averse. However, a closer inspection reveals significantly different risk results. Specific demographic and socioeconomic characteristics affect farmers' risk preferences but are not stable across elicitation methods.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / +
页数:33
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Driouchi, Ahmed ;
L'Haridon, Olivier .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2011, 71 (01) :63-80
[2]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[3]   Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure [J].
Anderson, Lisa R. ;
Mellor, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2009, 39 (02) :137-160
[4]   Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Miller, J .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (02) :737-753
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[6]   Risk Pooling, Risk Preferences, and Social Networks [J].
Attanasio, Orazio ;
Barr, Abigail ;
Camilo Cardenas, Juan ;
Genicot, Garance ;
Meghir, Costas .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 4 (02) :134-167
[7]   Community-Based Risk Management Arrangements: A Review [J].
Bhattamishra, Ruchira ;
Barrett, Christopher B. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (07) :923-932
[8]   ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK - EXPERIMENTAL-MEASUREMENT IN RURAL INDIA [J].
BINSWANGER, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1980, 62 (03) :395-407
[9]   Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data [J].
Bocqueho, Geraldine ;
Jacquet, Florence ;
Reynaud, Arnaud .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) :135-172
[10]   HIGH REWARD EXPERIMENTS WITHOUT HIGH EXPENDITURE FOR THE EXPERIMENTER [J].
BOLLE, F .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 11 (02) :157-167