Patient Preferences for Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Study

被引:8
作者
Porath, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Meka, Arjun P. [1 ]
Morrow, Chelsea [1 ]
Iyengar, Rahul [1 ]
Shtull-Leber, Eytan [2 ]
Fagerlin, Angela [3 ,4 ]
Meurer, William J. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Maricopa Integrated Hlth Syst, Dept Emergency Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SHARED DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1111/acem.13404
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnostic testing is common during emergency department (ED) visits. Little is understood about patient preferences for such testing. We hypothesized that a patient's willingness to undergo diagnostic testing is influenced by the potential benefit, risk, and personal cost. Methods: We conducted a cross sectional survey among ED patients for diagnostic testing in two hypothetical scenarios: chest pain (CP) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Each scenario defined specific risks, benefits, and costs of testing. The odds of a participant desiring diagnostic testing were calculated using a series of nested multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Participants opted for diagnostic testing 68.2% of the time, including 69.7% of CP and 66.7% of all mTBI scenarios. In the CP scenario, 81% of participants desired free testing versus 59% when it was associated with a $100 copay (difference = 22%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16% to 28%). Similarly, in the mTBI scenario, 73% of adult participants desired free testing versus 56% when charged a $100 copayment (difference = 17%, 95% CI = 11% to 24%). Benefit and risk had mixed effects across the scenarios. In fully adjusted models, the association between cost and desire for testing persisted in the CP (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.47) and adult mTBI (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.67) scenarios. Conclusions: In this ED-based study, patient preferences for diagnostic testing differed significantly across levels of risk, benefit, and cost of diagnostic testing. Cost was the strongest and most consistent factor associated with decreased desire for testing.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 633
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care [J].
Barry, Michael J. ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) :780-781
[2]   Patient Perceptions of Computed Tomographic Imaging and Their Understanding of Radiation Risk and Exposure [J].
Baumann, Brigitte M. ;
Chen, Esther H. ;
Mills, Angela M. ;
Glaspey, Lindsey ;
Thompson, Nicole M. ;
Jones, Molly K. ;
Farner, Michael C. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (01) :1-7
[3]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[4]   Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars [J].
Elwyn, G ;
Edwards, A ;
Gwyn, R ;
Grol, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :753-756
[5]   The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices [J].
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian ;
Ubel, Peter ;
Jancovic, Aleksandra ;
Lucas, Todd ;
Fagerlin, Angela .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) :448-455
[6]   Risk, Benefit, and Cost Thresholds for Emergency Department Testing: A Cross-sectional, Scenario-based Study [J].
Meka, Arjun Prasad ;
Porath, Jonathan Douglas ;
Iyengar, Rahul ;
Morrow, Chelsea ;
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Meurer, William J. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (06) :686-690
[7]   A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis [J].
Peduzzi, P ;
Concato, J ;
Kemper, E ;
Holford, TR ;
Feinstein, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (12) :1373-1379
[8]   Appropriate" diagnostic testing: Supporting diagnostics with evidence-based medicine and shared decision making" [J].
Polaris J.J.Z. ;
Katz J.N. .
BMC Research Notes, 7 (1)
[9]  
Schapira MM, 2006, J HEALTH COMMUN, V11
[10]  
Tevis Sarah E, 2014, J Hosp Adm, V3, P150