Risk Evaluation during the Takeover of Automated Vehicles Based on Improved Driving Safety Field

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xin [1 ]
Zhao, Min [2 ]
Sun, Dihua [2 ]
Mao, Peng [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Automot Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Automat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
CICTP 2021: ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ENHANCED CONNECTION | 2021年
关键词
TIME;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A comprehensive and accurate evaluation of takeover risk is key to improving the safety of automated vehicles. The research on takeover mainly focuses on the factors affecting takeover performance, and rarely involves the quantification of the risk of automated vehicles executing a takeover. This study considers the influence of physical object shape on field distribution, in order to improve the existing driving safety field. On this basis, the safety index of a takeover was established, and a risk evaluation method of takeover considering multiple risk sources was proposed. The experimental results show that the improved field strength distribution is more consistent with the actual situation, and it solves the problem of overestimating and underestimating risk. The proposed takeover risk evaluation method considering multiple risk sources has good rationality.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 629
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Takeover quality prediction based on driver physiological state of different cognitive tasks in conditionally automated driving
    Zhu, Jieyu
    Ma, Yanli
    Zhang, Yiran
    Zhang, Yaping
    Lv, Chen
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2023, 57
  • [22] Drivers' gap acceptance during parking maneuvers as a basis for initiating driving actions in automated vehicles
    Hensch, Ann-Christin
    Beggiato, Matthias
    Krems, Josef F.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 92 : 133 - 142
  • [23] Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving
    Liang, Nade
    Yang, Jing
    Yu, Denny
    Prakah-Asante, Kwaku O.
    Curry, Reates
    Blommer, Mike
    Swaminathan, Radhakrishnan
    Pitts, Brandon J.
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 157
  • [24] Experimental investigation of the multianticipation mechanism in commercial SAE level 2 automated driving vehicles and associated safety impact
    Dona, Riccardo
    Mattas, Konstantinos
    Vass, Sandor
    Ciuffo, Biagio
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2024, 208
  • [25] Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?
    Huang, Wei-Chi
    Fan, Lin-Han
    Han, Zi-Jian
    Niu, Ya-Feng
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2024, 205
  • [26] A Simulator Study Comparing Characteristics of Manual and Automated Driving During Lane Changes of Long Combination Vehicles
    Nilsson, Peter
    Laine, Leo
    Jacobson, Bengt
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 18 (09) : 2514 - 2524
  • [27] Take-Over Safety Evaluation of Conditionally Automated Vehicles under Typical Highway Segments
    Li, Yi
    Xuan, Zhaoze
    SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (09):
  • [28] Evaluation of Visual Risk Perception of Automated Driving Tasks by Analyzing Gaze Pattern Dispersion
    Liu, Chao
    Nacpil, Edric John Cruz
    Hou, Wenbin
    Qin, Yaling
    Zheng, Rencheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES, 2024, 9 (01): : 775 - 786
  • [29] Acceleration-Based Collision Criticality Metric for Holistic Online Safety Assessment in Automated Driving
    Wang, Cheng
    Popp, Christoph
    Winner, Hermann
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 70662 - 70674
  • [30] Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving
    Lin, Qingfeng
    Li, Shiqi
    Ma, Xiaowei
    Lu, Guangquan
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 143