Removal, redistribution, and potential risks of soil Cd, Pb, and Zn after washing with various extractants

被引:21
作者
Chen, Chunle [1 ]
Chen, Yanhui [1 ]
Xie, Tuanhui [1 ]
Wang, Ming Kuang [1 ]
Wang, Guo [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Resource & Environm Sci, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Bioavailability; Feasibility; Heavy metals; Remediation; Soil pollution; CONTAMINATED SOIL; HEAVY-METALS; CHELATING-AGENTS; PADDY SOILS; EDTA; MOBILIZATION; REMEDIATION; CHLORIDE; ACID; CU;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-015-4872-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of four different washing extractants-HCl, FeCl3, citric acid, and EDTA-in removing Cd, Pb, and Zn from polluted soil was studied. The removal of these metals, their redistribution between fractions, and the potential risks posed by them, in soils washed with the tested extractants, were examined. Although all the rounds of washing removed Cd, Pb, and Zn from soil, the first round removed more metals than subsequent rounds. Each of the four extractants had different effects on the removal of the metals. At the end of the first round of washing, HCl, EDTA, and FeCl3 were the most effective in removing Zn, Pb, and Cd, respectively. Both the single round and five successive rounds of washing with various extractants resulted in significant increases in Pb in the exchangeable/acid extractable fraction. Washing with HCl, EDTA, and FeCl3 significantly reduced potential risks (calculated as the Potential Risk Index, PRI) posed by Cd in washed soil. The first round of washing, using all extractants, increased the risks posed by Pb and Zn. However, five successive rounds of washing with FeCl3 and EDTA reduced the risk posed by Pb, and washing with citric acid and FeCl3 increased the risks posed by Zn. EDTA and HCl were better for reducing Zn risks, and successive washing with EDTA and FeCl3 were more effective in reducing Pb risks than the other extractants. Finally, five successive rounds of washing, with all the extractants, effectively reduced the potential risks posed by Cd. Among the four reagents, EDTA was advised to be the alternative of the washing reagent by significantly reducing the PRI values of Cd, Pb, and Zn.
引用
收藏
页码:16881 / 16888
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Metal associations in soils before and after EDTA extractive decontamination:: implications for the effectiveness of further cleanup procedures [J].
Barona, A ;
Aranguiz, I ;
Elías, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2001, 113 (01) :79-85
[2]  
Bourg A., 1995, Biogeodynamics of pollutants in soils and sediments, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-79418-6_4, 10.1007/978-3-642-79418-6_4]
[3]   Soil washing for metal removal:: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications [J].
Dermont, G. ;
Bergeron, M. ;
Mercier, G. ;
Richer-Lafleche, M. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2008, 152 (01) :1-31
[4]   Heavy metals mobilization from harbour sediments using EDTA and citric acid as chelating agents [J].
Di Palma, L. ;
Mecozzi, R. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 147 (03) :768-775
[5]   A washing procedure to mobilize mixed contaminants from soil: II. Heavy metals [J].
Ehsan, Sadia ;
Prasher, Shiv O. ;
Marshall, William D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (06) :2084-2091
[6]   Multi-step leaching of Pb and Zn contaminated soils with EDTA [J].
Finzgar, Neza ;
Lestan, Domen .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 66 (05) :824-832
[7]   Heap leaching of Pb and Zn contaminated soil using ozone/UV treatment of EDTA extractants [J].
Finzgar, Neza ;
Lestan, Domen .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2006, 63 (10) :1736-1743
[8]  
GAQQF (General Administration of Quality and Quarantine of Fujian Province), 2008, DB35T8592008 GAQQF
[9]   Effect of Soil Washing and Liming on Bioavailability of Heavy Metals in Acid Contaminated Soil [J].
Guo, Xiaofang ;
Wei, Zebin ;
Penn, C. J. ;
Xu, Tianfen ;
Wu, Qitang .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2013, 77 (02) :432-441
[10]   Metal (Cu, Cd and Zn) removal and stabilization during multiple soil washing by saponin [J].
Gusiatin, Zygmunt Mariusz ;
Klimiuk, Ewa .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 86 (04) :383-391