The assessment of depression in the postnatal period: A comparison of four self-report questionnaires

被引:31
|
作者
Condon, JT
Corkindale, CJ
机构
[1] Department of Psychiatry, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park
关键词
assessment; depression; postnatal;
D O I
10.3109/00048679709073844
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain the degree of agreement between four self-report depression scales, with particular emphasis on whether each scale would identify the same subgroup of women as being 'most depressed'. Method: The questionnaires were administered to a sample of approximately 200 postnatal women at 4 weeks, 4 months and 8 months after delivery. The instruments were: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale; and the depression subscale of the Profile of Mood States. Results: Agreement between pairs of instruments, in terms of identifying the most depressed subgroup of women in the cohort, only averaged approximately 40%. Agreement between the three instruments was only about 25%. Conclusions: This poor level of agreement most likely reflects the different emphasis in item content of the questionnaires, which in turn reflects different notions of 'depression' held by the designers of the instruments. The implications of the findings for research and clinical practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scoring rules and rating formats of Self-report Depression Questionnaires: A comparison of approaches
    Zimmerman, Mark
    D'Avanzato, Catherine
    Attiullah, Naureen
    Friedman, Michael
    Toba, Cristina
    Boerescu, Daniela A.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2014, 218 (1-2) : 225 - 228
  • [2] Case identification of depression with self-report questionnaires
    Sheeran, T
    Zimmerman, M
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2002, 109 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [3] Understanding Indecisiveness: Dimensionality of Two Self-Report Questionnaires and Associations With Depression and Indecision
    Hallenbeck, Haijing Wu
    Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
    Thompson, Renee J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (02) : 176 - 187
  • [4] The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice
    Wolfe, F
    Pincus, T
    Thompson, AK
    Doyle, J
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2003, 49 (01): : 59 - 63
  • [5] Depression in fathers in the postnatal period: Assessment of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a screening measure
    Edmondson, Olivia J. H.
    Psychogiou, Lamprini
    Vlachos, Haido
    Netsi, Elena
    Ramchandani, Paul G.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 125 (1-3) : 365 - 368
  • [6] Assessment of depression in epilepsy: the utility of common and disease-specific self-report depression measures
    Strober, Lauren B.
    Chapin, Jessica
    Spirou, Angela
    Tesar, George
    Viguera, Adele
    Najm, Imad
    Busch, Robyn M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 32 (04) : 681 - 699
  • [7] Assessment of late-life depression via self-report measures: a review
    Balsamo, Michela
    Cataldi, Fedele
    Carlucci, Leonardo
    Padulo, Caterina
    Fairfield, Beth
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 : 2021 - 2044
  • [8] Prevalence of major depression in ALS: Comparison of a semi-structured interview and four self-report measures
    Ferentinos, Panagiotis
    Paparrigopoulos, Thomas
    Rentzos, Michael
    Zouvelou, Vassiliki
    Alexakis, Theodoros
    Evdokimidis, Ioannis
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS, 2011, 12 (04): : 297 - 302
  • [9] Concordance between self-report and clinician's assessment of depression
    Corruble, E
    Legrand, JM
    Zvenigorowski, H
    Duret, C
    Guelfi, JD
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (05) : 457 - 465
  • [10] Are we using appropriate self-report questionnaires for detecting anxiety and depression in women with early breast cancer?
    Hall, A
    A'Hern, R
    Fallowfield, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 (01) : 79 - 85