Optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes and associated hospital characteristics

被引:8
作者
Campbell, Katherine H. [1 ]
Illuzzi, Jessica L. [1 ]
Lee, Henry C. [2 ]
Lin, Haiqun [3 ]
Lipkind, Heather S. [1 ]
Lundsberg, Lisbet S. [1 ]
Pettker, Christian M. [1 ]
Xu, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatal & Dev Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2019年 / 46卷 / 02期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
childbirth; hospital variation; morbidity; obstetric; quality and safety; CARE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE; CESAREAN DELIVERY; RATES; MORBIDITY; QUALITY; COMPLICATIONS; VARY;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12400
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background This study aims to examine hospital variation in both maternal and neonatal morbidities and identify institutional characteristics associated with hospital performance in a combined measure of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods Using the California Linked Birth File containing data from birth certificate and hospital discharge records, we identified 1 322 713 term births delivered at 248 hospitals during 2010-2012. For each hospital, a risk-standardized rate of severe maternal morbidities and a risk-standardized rate of severe newborn morbidities were calculated after adjusting for patient clinical risk factors. Hospitals were ranked based on combined information on their maternal and newborn morbidity rates. Results Risk-standardized severe maternal and severe newborn morbidity rates varied substantially across hospitals (10th to 90th percentile range = 67.5-148.2 and 141.8-508.0 per 10 000 term births, respectively), although there was no significant association between the two (P = 0.15). Government hospitals (non-Federal) were more likely than other hospitals to be in worse rank quartiles (P value for trend = 0.004), whereas larger volume was associated with better rank among hospitals in the first three quartiles (P = 0.004). The most prevalent morbidities that differed progressively across hospital rank quartiles were severe hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and heart failure during procedure/surgery for mothers, and severe infection, respiratory complication, and shock/resuscitation for neonates. Conclusions Hospitals with low maternal morbidity rates may not have low neonatal morbidity rates and vice versa, highlighting the importance of assessing joint maternal-newborn outcomes in order to fully characterize a hospital's obstetrical performance. Hospitals with smaller volume and government ownership tend to have less desirable outcomes and warrant additional attention in future quality improvement efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 299
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Rates Of Major Obstetrical Complications Vary Almost Fivefold Among US Hospitals
    Glance, Laurent G.
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Glantz, J. Christopher
    Wissler, Richard N.
    Qian, Feng
    Marroquin, Bridget M.
    Mukamel, Dana B.
    Kellermann, Arthur L.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (08) : 1330 - 1336
  • [22] Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals
    Glantz, J. Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (04) : 636 - 642
  • [23] Telemedicine Applications in Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Greiner, Andrea L.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 60 (04) : 853 - 866
  • [24] Vital statistics linked birth infant death and hospital discharge record linkage for epidemiological studies
    Herrchen, B
    Gould, JB
    Nesbitt, TS
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1997, 30 (04): : 290 - 305
  • [25] Site of delivery contribution to black-white severe maternal morbidity disparity
    Howell, Elizabeth A.
    Egorova, Natalia N.
    Balbierz, Amy
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    Hebert, Paul L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [26] Association Between Hospital-Level Obstetric Quality Indicators and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity
    Howell, Elizabeth A.
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    Hebert, Paul L.
    Balbierz, Amy
    Egorova, Natalia
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (15): : 1531 - 1541
  • [27] Monitoring childbirth morbidity using hospital discharge data: further development and application of a composite measure
    Korst, Lisa M.
    Fridman, Moshe
    Lu, Michael C.
    Mitchell, Connie
    Lawton, Elizabeth
    Griffin, Flojaune
    Gregory, Kimberly D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (03) : 268.e1 - 268.e16
  • [28] Hospital rates of maternal and neonatal infection in a low-risk population
    Korst, LM
    Fridman, M
    Friedlich, PS
    Lu, MC
    Reyes, C
    Hobel, CJ
    Chavez, GF
    Gregory, KD
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2005, 9 (03) : 307 - 316
  • [29] Cesarean Delivery Rates Vary Tenfold Among US Hospitals; Reducing Variation May Address Quality And Cost Issues
    Kozhimannil, Katy Backes
    Law, Michael R.
    Virnig, Beth A.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (03) : 527 - 535
  • [30] The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data
    Lydon-Rochelle, MT
    Holt, VL
    Cárdenas, V
    Nelson, JC
    Easterling, TR
    Gardella, C
    Callaghan, WM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) : 125 - 134