Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization

被引:50
作者
Gillick, Bernadette T. [1 ]
Kirton, Adam [2 ]
Carmel, Jason B. [3 ]
Minhas, Preet [4 ]
Bikson, Marom [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Program Phys Therapy, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp Res Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Burke Med Res Inst, Weill Cornell Med Coll, White Plains, NY USA
[4] CUNY, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pediatrics; stroke; hemiparesis; modeling; transcranial direct current stimulation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CEREBRAL-PALSY; TDCS; EXCITABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; CHILDREN; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Objective: Construct child-specific tDCS dosing parameters through case study within a perinatal stroke tDCS safety and feasibility trial. Methods: 10-year-old subject with a diagnosis of presumed perinatal ischemic stroke and hemiparesis was identified. T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans used to derive computerized model for current flow and electrode positions. Workflow using modeling results and consideration of dosage in previous clinical trials was incorporated. Prior ad hoc adult montages vs. de novo optimized montages provided distinct risk benefit analysis. Approximating adult dose required consideration of changes in both peak brain current flow and distribution which further tradeoff between maximizing efficacy and adding safety factors. Electrode size, position, current intensity, compliance voltage, and duration were controlled independently in this process. Results: Brain electric fields modeled and compared to values previously predicted models (Datta et al., 2011; Minhas et al., 2012). Approximating conservative brain current flow patterns and intensities used in previous adult trials for comparable indications, the optimal current intensity established was 0.7 mA for 10 min with a tDCS C3/C4 montage. Specifically 0.7 mA produced comparable peak brain current intensity of an average adult receiving 1.0 mA. Electrode size of 5 x 7 cm(2) with 1.0 mA and low-voltage tDCS was employed to maximize tolerability. Safety and feasibility confirmed with subject tolerating the session well and no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Rational approaches to dose customization, with steps informed by computational modeling, may improve guidance for pediatric stroke tDCS trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION AS A TOOL TO INDUCE LANGUAGE RECOVERY IN PATIENTS WITH POST-STROKE APHASIA [J].
Ulanov, M. A. ;
Shtyrov, Y. Y. ;
Stroganova, T. A. .
ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 2018, 68 (06) :703-718
[42]   Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in the initial weeks post-stroke: a pilot randomized study [J].
Takahashi, Marcela Tengler Carvalho ;
Balardin, Joana Bisol ;
Bazan, Paulo Rodrigo ;
Boasquevisque, Danielle de Sa ;
Amaro Junior, Edson ;
Conforto, Adriana Bastos .
EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2024, 22 :1-10
[43]   Enhancement of Cortical Excitability and Lower Limb Motor Function in Patients With Stroke by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Chang, Min Cheol ;
Kim, Dae Yul ;
Park, Dae Hwan .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (03) :561-566
[44]   Transcranial direct current stimulation for promoting motor function in cerebral palsy: a review [J].
Fleming, Melanie K. ;
Theologis, Tim ;
Buckingham, Rachel ;
Johansen-Berg, Heidi .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 15
[45]   High-Resolution Modeling Assisted Design of Customized and Individualized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Protocols [J].
Bikson, Marom ;
Rahman, Asif ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Fregni, Felipe ;
Merabet, Lotfi .
NEUROMODULATION, 2012, 15 (04) :306-315
[46]   Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on intracranial compliance in the subacute phase of stroke [J].
Nascimento, Monalisa Resende ;
Bernardes, Tiago Soares ;
Santos, Kelly Cristina Sousa ;
Silva, Gabrielly Fernanda ;
Bazan, Rodrigo ;
de Souza, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande ;
Luvizutto, Gustavo Jose .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 247
[47]   Transcranial direct current stimulation to improve naming abilities of persons with chronic aphasia: A preliminary study using individualized based protocol [J].
Ben Basat, Adi Lifshitz ;
Gvion, Aviah ;
Vatine, Jean-Jacques ;
Mashal, Nira .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2016, 38 :1-13
[48]   Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke [J].
Russo, Cristina ;
Carneiro, Maira I. Souza ;
Bolognini, Nadia ;
Fregni, Felipe .
NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (03) :215-222
[49]   Brain complexity in stroke recovery after bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation in mice [J].
Miraglia, Francesca ;
Pappalettera, Chiara ;
Barbati, Saviana Antonella ;
Podda, Maria Vittoria ;
Grassi, Claudio ;
Rossini, Paolo Maria ;
Vecchio, Fabrizio .
BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (03)
[50]   A Case of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation for Childhood Stroke Hemiparesis: A Brief Report [J].
Ciechanski, P. ;
Carlson, H. L. ;
Herrero, M. ;
Lane, C. ;
MacMaster, F. P. ;
Kirton, A. .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2020, 23 (02) :133-136