Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization

被引:49
作者
Gillick, Bernadette T. [1 ]
Kirton, Adam [2 ]
Carmel, Jason B. [3 ]
Minhas, Preet [4 ]
Bikson, Marom [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Program Phys Therapy, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp Res Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Burke Med Res Inst, Weill Cornell Med Coll, White Plains, NY USA
[4] CUNY, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2014年 / 8卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pediatrics; stroke; hemiparesis; modeling; transcranial direct current stimulation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CEREBRAL-PALSY; TDCS; EXCITABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; CHILDREN; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Objective: Construct child-specific tDCS dosing parameters through case study within a perinatal stroke tDCS safety and feasibility trial. Methods: 10-year-old subject with a diagnosis of presumed perinatal ischemic stroke and hemiparesis was identified. T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans used to derive computerized model for current flow and electrode positions. Workflow using modeling results and consideration of dosage in previous clinical trials was incorporated. Prior ad hoc adult montages vs. de novo optimized montages provided distinct risk benefit analysis. Approximating adult dose required consideration of changes in both peak brain current flow and distribution which further tradeoff between maximizing efficacy and adding safety factors. Electrode size, position, current intensity, compliance voltage, and duration were controlled independently in this process. Results: Brain electric fields modeled and compared to values previously predicted models (Datta et al., 2011; Minhas et al., 2012). Approximating conservative brain current flow patterns and intensities used in previous adult trials for comparable indications, the optimal current intensity established was 0.7 mA for 10 min with a tDCS C3/C4 montage. Specifically 0.7 mA produced comparable peak brain current intensity of an average adult receiving 1.0 mA. Electrode size of 5 x 7 cm(2) with 1.0 mA and low-voltage tDCS was employed to maximize tolerability. Safety and feasibility confirmed with subject tolerating the session well and no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Rational approaches to dose customization, with steps informed by computational modeling, may improve guidance for pediatric stroke tDCS trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancing Motor Performance by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Subacute Stroke Patients
    Kim, Deog Young
    Ohn, Suk Hoon
    Yang, Eun Joo
    Park, Chang-Il
    Jung, Kang Jae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2009, 88 (10) : 829 - 836
  • [22] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: The dimension of timing
    Giacobbe, V.
    Krebs, H. I.
    Volpe, B. T.
    Pascual-Leone, A.
    Rykman, A.
    Zeiarati, G.
    Fregni, F.
    Dipietro, L.
    Thickbroom, G. W.
    Edwards, D. J.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2013, 33 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [23] Transcranial direct current stimulation in the recovery of postural control after stroke: a pilot study
    Saeys, Wim
    Vereeck, Luc
    Lafosse, Christophe
    Truijen, Steven
    Wuyts, Floris L.
    Van De Heyning, Paul
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (20) : 1857 - 1863
  • [24] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
    Salazar, Claudia A. A.
    Feng, Wuwei
    Bonilha, Leonardo
    Kautz, Steven
    Jensen, Jens H. H.
    George, Mark S. S.
    Rowland, Nathan C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [25] Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A Review
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2009, 219 (01) : 14 - 19
  • [26] Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Renga, Vijay
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (06) : 759 - 768
  • [27] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Swallowing Function in Stroke Patients
    Shigematsu, Takashi
    Fujishima, Ichiro
    Ohno, Kikuo
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2013, 27 (04) : 363 - 369
  • [28] Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Jamil, Asif
    Fresnoza, Shane
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Vanderschelden, Benjamin
    Ivry, Richard B.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [29] Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study
    Hordacre, Brenton
    Moezzi, Bahar
    Ridding, Michael C.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2018, 39 (08) : 3326 - 3339
  • [30] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as neuromodulatory techniques in stroke rehabilitation
    Fuentes Calderon, Maria Antonia
    Olmedo Jimenez, Laura
    Sanchez Ledesma, Maria Jose
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY (TEEM'18), 2018, : 422 - 427