Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization

被引:50
作者
Gillick, Bernadette T. [1 ]
Kirton, Adam [2 ]
Carmel, Jason B. [3 ]
Minhas, Preet [4 ]
Bikson, Marom [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Program Phys Therapy, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp Res Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Burke Med Res Inst, Weill Cornell Med Coll, White Plains, NY USA
[4] CUNY, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pediatrics; stroke; hemiparesis; modeling; transcranial direct current stimulation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CEREBRAL-PALSY; TDCS; EXCITABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; CHILDREN; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Objective: Construct child-specific tDCS dosing parameters through case study within a perinatal stroke tDCS safety and feasibility trial. Methods: 10-year-old subject with a diagnosis of presumed perinatal ischemic stroke and hemiparesis was identified. T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans used to derive computerized model for current flow and electrode positions. Workflow using modeling results and consideration of dosage in previous clinical trials was incorporated. Prior ad hoc adult montages vs. de novo optimized montages provided distinct risk benefit analysis. Approximating adult dose required consideration of changes in both peak brain current flow and distribution which further tradeoff between maximizing efficacy and adding safety factors. Electrode size, position, current intensity, compliance voltage, and duration were controlled independently in this process. Results: Brain electric fields modeled and compared to values previously predicted models (Datta et al., 2011; Minhas et al., 2012). Approximating conservative brain current flow patterns and intensities used in previous adult trials for comparable indications, the optimal current intensity established was 0.7 mA for 10 min with a tDCS C3/C4 montage. Specifically 0.7 mA produced comparable peak brain current intensity of an average adult receiving 1.0 mA. Electrode size of 5 x 7 cm(2) with 1.0 mA and low-voltage tDCS was employed to maximize tolerability. Safety and feasibility confirmed with subject tolerating the session well and no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Rational approaches to dose customization, with steps informed by computational modeling, may improve guidance for pediatric stroke tDCS trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Lafon, Belen ;
Dechent, Peter ;
Parra, Lucas C. ;
Paulus, Walter .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 85 :1040-1047
[2]   Cathodal stimulation of human MT+ leads to elevated fMRI signal: A tDCS-fMRI study [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Kovacs, Gyula ;
Chaieb, Leila ;
Cziraki, Csaba ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Greenlee, Mark W. .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 30 (03) :255-263
[3]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[4]   Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets [J].
Bijsterbosch, Janine D. ;
Barker, Anthony T. ;
Lee, Kwang-Hyuk ;
Woodruff, P. W. R. .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2012, 50 (07) :671-681
[5]   Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Bikson, Marom ;
Rahman, Asif ;
Datta, Abhishek .
CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 43 (03) :176-183
[6]   Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of tDCS Combined With Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Poststroke Patients [J].
Bolognini, Nadia ;
Vallar, Giuseppe ;
Casati, Carlotta ;
Latif, Lydia Abdul ;
El-Nazer, Rasheda ;
Williams, Julie ;
Banco, Elisabetta ;
Macea, Debora Duarte ;
Tesio, Luigi ;
Chessa, Cecilia ;
Fregni, Felipe .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2011, 25 (09) :819-829
[7]   Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions [J].
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Bolognini, Nadia ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Wagner, Tim ;
Merabet, Lotfi ;
Edwards, Dylan J. ;
Valero-Cabre, Antoni ;
Rotenberg, Alexander ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Ferrucci, Roberta ;
Priori, Alberto ;
Boggio, Paulo Sergio ;
Fregni, Felipe .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) :175-195
[8]   A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation [J].
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky ;
Amadera, Joao ;
Berbel, Bruna ;
Volz, Magdalena Sarah ;
Rizzerio, Brenno Gomes ;
Fregni, Felipe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 14 (08) :1133-1145
[9]   tDCS-Induced Analgesia and Electrical Fields in Pain-Related Neural Networks in Chronic Migraine [J].
DaSilva, Alexandre F. ;
Mendonca, Mariana E. ;
Zaghi, Soroush ;
Lopes, Mariana ;
DosSantos, Marcos Fabio ;
Spierings, Egilius L. ;
Bajwa, Zahid ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Fregni, Felipe .
HEADACHE, 2012, 52 (08) :1283-1295
[10]   Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Zhou, Xiang ;
Su, Yuzhou ;
Parra, Lucas C. ;
Bikson, Marom .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (03)