Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization

被引:49
|
作者
Gillick, Bernadette T. [1 ]
Kirton, Adam [2 ]
Carmel, Jason B. [3 ]
Minhas, Preet [4 ]
Bikson, Marom [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Program Phys Therapy, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp Res Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Burke Med Res Inst, Weill Cornell Med Coll, White Plains, NY USA
[4] CUNY, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2014年 / 8卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pediatrics; stroke; hemiparesis; modeling; transcranial direct current stimulation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CEREBRAL-PALSY; TDCS; EXCITABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; CHILDREN; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Objective: Construct child-specific tDCS dosing parameters through case study within a perinatal stroke tDCS safety and feasibility trial. Methods: 10-year-old subject with a diagnosis of presumed perinatal ischemic stroke and hemiparesis was identified. T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans used to derive computerized model for current flow and electrode positions. Workflow using modeling results and consideration of dosage in previous clinical trials was incorporated. Prior ad hoc adult montages vs. de novo optimized montages provided distinct risk benefit analysis. Approximating adult dose required consideration of changes in both peak brain current flow and distribution which further tradeoff between maximizing efficacy and adding safety factors. Electrode size, position, current intensity, compliance voltage, and duration were controlled independently in this process. Results: Brain electric fields modeled and compared to values previously predicted models (Datta et al., 2011; Minhas et al., 2012). Approximating conservative brain current flow patterns and intensities used in previous adult trials for comparable indications, the optimal current intensity established was 0.7 mA for 10 min with a tDCS C3/C4 montage. Specifically 0.7 mA produced comparable peak brain current intensity of an average adult receiving 1.0 mA. Electrode size of 5 x 7 cm(2) with 1.0 mA and low-voltage tDCS was employed to maximize tolerability. Safety and feasibility confirmed with subject tolerating the session well and no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Rational approaches to dose customization, with steps informed by computational modeling, may improve guidance for pediatric stroke tDCS trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Facilitate Lower Limb Recovery Following Stroke: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Gowan, Samuel
    Hordacre, Brenton
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (05)
  • [2] The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke
    Kwon, Tae Gun
    Park, Eunhee
    Kang, Chung
    Chang, Won Hyuk
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 34 (06) : 915 - 923
  • [3] Immediate and Late Modulation of Interhemipheric Imbalance With Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Stroke
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Dileone, Michele
    Capone, Fioravante
    Pellegrino, Giovanni
    Ranieri, Federico
    Musumeci, Gabriella
    Florio, Lucia
    Di Pino, Giovanni
    Fregni, Felipe
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (06) : 841 - 848
  • [4] Combination of transcranial direct current stimulation and methylphenidate in subacute stroke
    Wang, Qing Mei
    Cui, Huashun
    Han, Soo Jeong
    Black-Schaffer, Randie
    Volz, Magdalena Sarah
    Lee, Yo -Tae
    Herman, Seth
    Latif, Lydia Abul
    Zafonte, Ross
    Fregni, Felipe
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 569 : 6 - 11
  • [5] Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke
    Dmochowski, Jacek P.
    Datta, Abhishek
    Huang, Yu
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Bikson, Marom
    Fridriksson, Julius
    Parra, Lucas C.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2013, 75 : 12 - 19
  • [6] Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics
    Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina, Guadalupe
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Vicario, Carmelo M.
    Molero-Chamizo, Andres
    REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES, 2017, 28 (02) : 173 - 184
  • [7] Determining Electrode Placement for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comparison of EEG- Versus TMS-Guided Methods
    Rich, Tonya L.
    Menk, Jeremiah S.
    Rudser, Kyle D.
    Chen, Mo
    Meekins, Gregg D.
    Pena, Edgar
    Feyma, Timothy
    Bawroski, Kay
    Bush, Christina
    Gillick, Bernadette T.
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 48 (06) : 367 - 375
  • [8] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor sequence learning and upper limb function after stroke
    Fleming, Melanie K.
    Rothwell, John C.
    Sztriha, Laszlo
    Teo, James T.
    Newham, Di J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (07) : 1389 - 1398
  • [9] Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke
    Mahmoudi, Hooman
    Haghighi, Afshin Borhani
    Petramfar, Peyman
    Jahanshahi, Sepehr
    Salehi, Zahra
    Fregni, Felipe
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (15-16) : 1383 - 1388
  • [10] Effects of Electrode Configurations in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation after Stroke
    Chelette, Kenneth
    Carrico, Cheryl
    Nichols, Laurie
    Salyers, Emily
    Sawaki, Lumy
    2014 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-HEALTH NETWORKING, APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES (HEALTHCOM), 2014, : 12 - 17