Advanced exergoenvironmental assessment of a natural gas-fired electricity generating facility

被引:38
作者
Acikkalp, Emin [1 ]
Aras, Haydar [2 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [3 ]
机构
[1] Bilecik SE Univ, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Fac Engn, Bilecik, Turkey
[2] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn & Architecture, Eskisehir, Turkey
[3] Yasar Univ, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Fac Engn, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Environmental assessment; Exergoenvironmental analysis; Advanced exergetic analysis; Advanced exergoenvironmental analysis; Exergy destruction rate; Electricity generation facility; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CYCLE POWER-PLANT; COMBINED HEAT; EXERGY; ENERGY; SYSTEM; AID;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.011
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents conventional and advanced exergoenvironmental analyses of an electricity generation facility located in the Eskisehir Industry Estate Zone, Turkey. This facility consists of gas turbine and steam cycles, which generate electrical power of approximately 37 MW and 18 MW, respectively. Exergy efficiency of the system is 0.402 and exergy destruction rate of the system is 78.242 MW. Unit exergy cost of electrical power generated by the system is 25.66 $/GJ and total exergoeconomic factor of the system is 0.279. Conventional exergy analysis method was applied to the system first. Next, exergy environmental impacts of exergy destruction rate within the facility's components were divided into four parts generally, as endogenous, exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable environmental impact of exergy destruction rate. Through this analysis, improvement potential of the environmental impacts of the components and the overall system and the environmental relations between the components were then determined. Finally, exergoenvironmental factor was determined as 0.277 and environmental impact of the electricity was 8.472 (Pts/h). The system has 33% development potential for environmental impacts while its components have weak relations because of big endogenous parts of environmental impacts (80%). It may be concluded that advanced exergoenvironmental analysis indicated that priority should be given to the GT and CC, while defining the improvement strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Comparative exergoenvironmental analysis and assessment of various residential heating systems [J].
Abusoglu, Aysegul ;
Sedeeq, Murad S. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 62 :268-277
[2]  
Acikkalp E, 2013, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V2, P2
[3]   Exergoenvironmental analysis of piston-prop aircrafts [J].
Altuntas, Onder ;
Karakoc, T. Hikmet ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2012, 10 (03) :290-298
[4]   Environmental impact assessment of a turboprop engine with the aid of exergy [J].
Atilgan, Ramazan ;
Turan, Onder ;
Altuntas, Onder ;
Aydin, Hakan ;
Synylo, Kateryna .
ENERGY, 2013, 58 :664-671
[5]  
Balli O, 2008, THESIS ESKISEHIR OSM
[6]   Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined heat and power (CHP) system [J].
Balli, Ozgur ;
Aras, Haydar ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (04) :273-289
[7]   Exergetic performance evaluation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system in Turkey [J].
Balli, Ozgur ;
Aras, Haydar ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2007, 31 (09) :849-866
[8]   Energetic analyses of the combined heat and power (CHP) system [J].
Balli, Ozgur ;
Aras, Haydar .
ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2007, 25 (01) :39-62
[9]   Exergy and environmental impact assessment of solar photoreactors for catalytic hydrogen production [J].
Baniasadi, E. ;
Dincer, I. ;
Naterer, G. F. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2012, 213 :330-337
[10]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM