Informed consent in surgical trials

被引:15
作者
Etchells, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Clin Epidemiol, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s002689900650
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
All participants must provide a valid consent to surgical clinical trials. A valid consent requires patient capacity, adequate disclosure of information, and voluntariness. Capacity is the ability to understand information relevant to making a decision and to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision. To protect vulnerable persons, an incapable person should not be enrolled in most clinical trials. The only exception is if the study can only be conducted on incapable persons. If the willing research participant is incapable, consent must be obtained from others through a process called substitute (or proxy) consent. Disclosure refers to the provision of relevant information to the patient and its comprehension by the patient. Most surgical trials carry more than minimal risks, so the requirement for careful disclosure of these risks to potential participants is generally stringent. Voluntariness refers to the freedom of a person to make a treatment decision. In specific circumstances related to emergency research, the requirement for consent may be waived. Waiver can be justified only if the delay required to obtain consent would prevent the research from occurring and only after prior consultation with from the "community" of potential research participants.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1219
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Beauchamp TL, 1995, Encyclopaedia of Bioethics, V3, P1240
[2]  
Faden R. R., 1986, HIST THEORY INFORMAL, P259
[3]   2 MODELS OF IMPLEMENTING INFORMED CONSENT [J].
LIDZ, CW ;
APPELBAUM, PS ;
MEISEL, A .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (06) :1385-1389
[4]   Measuring capacity to complete an advance directive [J].
Molloy, DW ;
Silberfeld, M ;
Darzins, P ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Singer, PA ;
Rush, B ;
Bedard, M ;
Strang, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1996, 44 (06) :660-664
[5]  
Protection of Human Subjects, 1996, FED REGISTER, V61, P51497
[6]   UNDERSTANDING PATIENTS DECISIONS - COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL PERSPECTIVES [J].
REDELMEIER, DA ;
ROZIN, P ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (01) :72-76