Implicit bias, ideological bias, and epistemic risks in philosophy

被引:12
作者
Peters, Uwe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Log & Philosophy Sci, Kardinaal Mercierpl 2, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] UCL, Dept Econ, London, England
关键词
epistemic risks; ideological bias; implicit bias; SCIENCE; SKEPTICISM; ARGUMENTS; DIVERSITY; GENDER; VALUES; RACE;
D O I
10.1111/mila.12194
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
It has been argued that implicit biases are operative in philosophy and lead to significant epistemic costs in the field. Philosophers working on this issue have focused mainly on implicit gender and race biases. They have overlooked ideological bias, which targets political orientations. Psychologists have found ideological bias in their field and have argued that it has negative epistemic effects on scientific research. I relate this debate to the field of philosophy and argue that if, as some studies suggest, the same bias also exists in philosophy then it will lead to hitherto unrecognised epistemic hazards in the field. Furthermore, the bias is epistemically different from the more familiar biases in respects that are important for epistemology, ethics, and metaphilosophy.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 419
页数:27
相关论文
共 104 条