Visual Acuity, Quality of Vision, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation with a Trifocal or Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

被引:15
作者
Tran, Dan B. [1 ]
Owyang, Ashley [1 ]
Hwang, Jin [1 ]
Potvin, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Coastal Vis Med Grp, 293 S Main St,Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Sci Vis, Bend, OR USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
trifocal IOL; EDOF IOL; presbyopia correction; cataract surgery; extended depth of focus; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; RANGE;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S295503
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the visual acuity, quality of vision and patient reported outcomes for patients that were either bilaterally implanted with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) or an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL. Design: Single site, prospective, non-interventional, masked, two-arm comparative study. Methods: Subjects who had prior uncomplicated cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of one of the lenses above were evaluated. Subjects in each group were assessed during a single visit. The uncorrected and best distance-corrected binocular near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm), and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured, along with a spectacle independence questionnaire, a quality of vision questionnaire and contrast sensitivity measured in both mesopic and photopic conditions. Results: The study included 23 EDOF and 25 trifocal subjects. Binocular Uncorrected VAs were similar at distance and intermediate, but about 1.5 lines better at near with the trifocal (p < 0.001). Binocular best corrected distance - VA was significantly better with the EDOF lens (0.5 lines, p < 0.001), though the mean VA was better than 20/20 in both groups. Distance-corrected intermediate and near VA were significantly better with the trifocal IOL (1 line and 1.5 lines respectively, p < 0.001). Significantly more trifocal subjects had 20/25 or better VA at all three test distances (64% vs 4%, p<0.001). Patient reported spectacle independence was significantly higher in the trifocal group, driven primarily by differences in near vision. Mesopic and photopic binocular contrast sensitivity, satisfaction and subjective quality of vision scores were similar between groups. Conclusion: The trifocal IOL provided significantly better near vision (1.5 lines) with slightly worse distance vision (0.5 lines), while providing similar contrast sensitivity and visual quality. It may be the preferred choice for patients desiring more spectacle independence.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Reported Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence Following Bilateral Implantation of the PanOptix® Trifocal Intraocular Lens [J].
Blehm, Clayton ;
Potvin, Richard .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 15 :2907-2912
[32]   Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation [J].
Chao, Chen-Cheng ;
Lin, Hung-Yuan ;
Lee, Chia-Yi ;
Mai, Elsa Lin-Chin ;
Lian, Ie-Bin ;
Chang, Chao-Kai .
HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
[33]   Contrast Sensitivity and Patient Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Bi-Aspheric Hydrophobic Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens [J].
Tana-Rivero, Pedro ;
Orts-Vila, Paz ;
Aguilar-Corcoles, Salvador ;
Tana-Sanz, Pedro ;
Tana-Sanz, Santiago .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 :247-258
[34]   Visual Outcomes and Subjective Experience After Combined Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus and Trifocal IOLs [J].
McNeely, Richard N. ;
Moutari, Salissou ;
Palme, Christoph ;
Moore, Jonathan E. .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (05) :326-+
[35]   Neurosensory binocular vision after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with micro-monovision: a prospective cohort study [J].
Sun, Tong ;
Zhao, Xiaorui ;
Liu, Yiyun ;
Lan, Qianqian ;
Tang, Chuhao ;
Qin, Rui ;
Bian, Linbo ;
Li, Wenlong ;
Qi, Hong .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01)
[36]   Real-life visual acuity outcomes following extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation post-phacoemulsification targeting very mild myopia [J].
Blavakis, E. ;
Panos, G. D. ;
Kecik, M. ;
Bravetti, G. E. ;
Massa, H. .
JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2025, 48 (05) :1-8
[37]   A Comparative Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses [J].
Ang, Robert Edward ;
Picache, Gian Carlo S. ;
Rivera, Mark Christian R. ;
Lopez, Lord Ryan L. ;
Cruz, Emerson M. .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 :2339-2351
[38]   Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens [J].
Moshirfar, Majid ;
Ellis, James ;
Beesley, Daniel ;
McCabe, Shannon E. ;
Lewis, Adam ;
Jnr, William B. West ;
Ronquillo, Yasmyne ;
Snr, Phillip Hoopes .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 15 :3051-3063
[39]   Prospective Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Diffractive Trifocal Extended Depth-of-Focus and Diffractive Trifocal Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses [J].
Nagy, Zoltan Z. ;
Dorman, Peter ;
Szalczer, Szilard ;
Kiss, Huba .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2025, 41 (02) :e102-e113
[40]   Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation [J].
Chu, Mei-Fang ;
Hui, Na ;
Wang, Cong-Yi ;
Yu, Lei ;
Ma, Bo ;
Li, Yan ;
Pei, Cheng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 12 (10) :1575-1581