Visual Acuity, Quality of Vision, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation with a Trifocal or Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

被引:14
作者
Tran, Dan B. [1 ]
Owyang, Ashley [1 ]
Hwang, Jin [1 ]
Potvin, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Coastal Vis Med Grp, 293 S Main St,Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Sci Vis, Bend, OR USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
trifocal IOL; EDOF IOL; presbyopia correction; cataract surgery; extended depth of focus; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; RANGE;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S295503
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the visual acuity, quality of vision and patient reported outcomes for patients that were either bilaterally implanted with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) or an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL. Design: Single site, prospective, non-interventional, masked, two-arm comparative study. Methods: Subjects who had prior uncomplicated cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of one of the lenses above were evaluated. Subjects in each group were assessed during a single visit. The uncorrected and best distance-corrected binocular near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm), and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured, along with a spectacle independence questionnaire, a quality of vision questionnaire and contrast sensitivity measured in both mesopic and photopic conditions. Results: The study included 23 EDOF and 25 trifocal subjects. Binocular Uncorrected VAs were similar at distance and intermediate, but about 1.5 lines better at near with the trifocal (p < 0.001). Binocular best corrected distance - VA was significantly better with the EDOF lens (0.5 lines, p < 0.001), though the mean VA was better than 20/20 in both groups. Distance-corrected intermediate and near VA were significantly better with the trifocal IOL (1 line and 1.5 lines respectively, p < 0.001). Significantly more trifocal subjects had 20/25 or better VA at all three test distances (64% vs 4%, p<0.001). Patient reported spectacle independence was significantly higher in the trifocal group, driven primarily by differences in near vision. Mesopic and photopic binocular contrast sensitivity, satisfaction and subjective quality of vision scores were similar between groups. Conclusion: The trifocal IOL provided significantly better near vision (1.5 lines) with slightly worse distance vision (0.5 lines), while providing similar contrast sensitivity and visual quality. It may be the preferred choice for patients desiring more spectacle independence.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a Secondary Sulcus Intraocular Lens with an Extended Depth of Focus
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Potvin, Richard
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 16 : 1861 - 1869
  • [22] Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in a Large Population
    Carreno, Edgardo
    Carreno, Edgardo A.
    Carreno, Rodrigo
    Carreno, Maricarmen
    Lopez, Veronica
    Potvin, Richard
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 369 - 376
  • [23] Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens
    Pilger, Daniel
    Homburg, David
    Brockmann, Tobias
    Torun, Necip
    Bertelmann, Eckart
    von Sonnleithner, Christoph
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 425 - 432
  • [24] Visual Acuity, Defocus Curve, Reading Speed and Patient Satisfaction with a Combined Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Multifocal Intraocular Lens Modality
    Sandoval, Helga P.
    Potvin, Richard
    Solomon, Kerry D.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 2667 - 2677
  • [25] The relationship between patient satisfaction and visual and optical outcome after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus multifocal intraocular lens
    Mihaltz, Kata
    Szegedi, Stephan
    Steininger, Jolanda
    Vecsei-Marlovits, Pia Veronika
    ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [26] Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Sheppard, Amy L.
    Shah, Sunil
    Bhatt, Uday
    Bhogal, Gurpreet
    Wolffsohn, James S.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (03) : 343 - 349
  • [27] Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Functional Outcomes after Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Patients with Stable and Mild Glaucoma
    Urcola, Aritz
    Lauzirika, Gorka
    Illarramendi, Igor
    Soto-Velasco, Andrea
    Sanchez-Avila, Ronald
    Fuente-Garcia, Carlota
    Fernandez-Garcia, Aitor
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2025, : 1039 - 1051
  • [28] Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens
    Mendicute, Javier
    Kapp, Alexander
    Levy, Pierre
    Krommes, Gero
    Arias-Puente, Alfonso
    Tomalla, Mark
    Barraquer, Elena
    Rozot, Pascal
    Bouchut, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [29] Nondiffractive wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: visual performance and patient-reported outcomes
    Kohnen, Thomas
    Petermann, Kerstin
    Boehm, Myriam
    Hemkeppler, Eva
    Ahmad, Wasim
    Hinzelmann, Lisa
    Pawlowicz, Katarzyna
    Jandewerth, Tyll
    Lwowski, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [30] Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Rodov, Luba
    Reitblat, Olga
    Levy, Adi
    Assia, Ehud, I
    Kleinmann, Guy
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 35 (07) : 434 - +