Protruding the tongue improves posterior rhinomanometry in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

被引:12
作者
Coste, A
Lofaso, F
d'Ortho, MP
Louis, B
Dahan, E
Peynegre, R
Harf, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Henri Mondor, Serv Physiol Explorat Fonctionnelles, F-94010 Creteil, France
[2] Hop Henri Mondor, Serv Otorhinolaryngol, INSERM, U492, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
nasal resistance; obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome; upper airways;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.99.14612789
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
In posterior rhinomanometry (PRM), oropharyngeal pressure is measured using a tube placed between the tongue and the hard palate. For valid results the patient must position the tongue and soft palate so that bath the oropharynx and nasopharynx remain open. A high rate of failure of conventional PRM has been reported in normal individuals. In patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), upper airway abnormalities may further increase the failure rate. This study proposes a modification of the technique in which protrusion of the tongue enhances pressure transmission between the nasopharynx and the mouth. In eight normal subjects, resistance was similar when measured by both methods. Of 24 OSAS patients, conventional PRM was unsuccessful in 11. In the remaining 13 patients, a significant correlation between the two methods was found, but resistance was lower by "tongue-out" than by conventional PRM, consistent with a decrease, during tongue protrusion, in retropalatal resistance, which is a component of the "nasal" resistance measured by PRM. In 26 OSAS patients, unilateral nasal resistance values measured by "tongue-out" PRM were similar to those measured by anterior rhinomanometry. When the "tongue-out" method was used routinely in 541 snorers, failure rates were 1.1% in the 272 non-OSAS patients and 3.7% in the 269 OSAS patients. These results indicate that posterior rhinomanometry with tongue protrusion is a highly effective tool for measuring nasal resistance in snorers.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1282
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] NASAL RESISTANCE IN OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA
    ATKINS, M
    TASKAR, V
    CLAYTON, N
    STONE, P
    WOODCOCK, A
    [J]. CHEST, 1994, 105 (04) : 1133 - 1135
  • [2] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [3] An evaluation of active anterior and posterior rhinomanometry in British adults
    Canbay, EI
    Bhatia, SN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 1996, 10 (01): : 33 - 37
  • [4] Clement P A, 1984, Rhinology, V22, P151
  • [5] COLE P, 1987, Rhinology (Utrecht), V25, P159
  • [6] COLE P, 1989, LARYNGOSCOPE, V99, P311
  • [7] NASAL SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SLEEP-APNEA
    DAYAL, VS
    PHILLIPSON, EA
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1985, 94 (06) : 550 - 554
  • [8] Effect of mandibular and tongue protrusion on upper airway size during wakefulness
    Ferguson, KA
    Love, LL
    Ryan, CF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 155 (05) : 1748 - 1754
  • [10] ASSESSMENT OF NASAL AIRWAY PATENCY - A COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS
    GLEESON, MJ
    YOULTEN, LJF
    SHELTON, DM
    SIODLAK, MZ
    EISER, NM
    WENGRAF, CL
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1986, 11 (02): : 99 - 107