Self-determination and the dissolution of Yugoslavia

被引:3
|
作者
Rady, M
机构
[1] Central European History, Sch. Slavonic and E. Europ. Studs.
[2] Department of History, Sch. Slavonic and E. Europ. Studs., University of London, London WC1E 7HU, Malet Street
关键词
self-determination; Yugoslavia; Badinter; state-integrity; state-dissolution; state-recognition;
D O I
10.1080/01419870.1996.9993916
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
The collapse of Yugoslavia provided the first instance of state dissolution in Europe since World War II. International organizations had little to guide their responses to the crisis. In measuring the rival claims of state integrity and of self-determination of peoples, international bodies followed the uti possidetis principle deriving from the period of decolonization. Once the dissolution of the state was pronounced, its internal boundaries assumed the character of international ones. The Badinter Committee, appointed to assist arbitration between the parties to the conflict, additionally made a demonstrable act of self-determination a precondition for the recognition of new states. As a consequence of its deliberations, the Badinter Committee may have provided not only a method of regulating state-succession bur also a mechanism for accomplishing state disintegration, particularly in the case of federations. Additionally, by assuming that the population of the subunit is possessed of the right of self-determination in the event of state dissolution, the Badinter Committee may have inadvertently extended the definition of 'people' to include all groups dwelling within legally defined territories.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 390
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Framing the Future: Self-Determination
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2015, 36 (01) : 20 - 23
  • [22] Reflections on Self-Determination Theory
    Vallerand, Robert J.
    Pelletier, Luc G.
    Koestner, Richard
    CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2008, 49 (03): : 257 - 262
  • [23] Self-determination and leader development
    Solansky, Stephanie T.
    MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2015, 46 (05) : 618 - 635
  • [24] Trading Sovereignty for Self-Determination
    Beall, Katherine M.
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2023, 68 (01)
  • [25] SELF-DETERMINATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Gajic, Aleksandar V.
    EU AT THE CROSSROADS - WAYS TO PRESERVE DEMOCRACY AND RULE OF LAW, 2024, 8 : 559 - 579
  • [26] Operationalizing digital self-determination
    Verhulst, Stefaan G.
    DATA & POLICY, 2023, 5
  • [27] Self-Determination and the Value of Nationality
    Maguire, Ruairi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2024,
  • [28] ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF DIGNITY AS SELF-DETERMINATION
    Razzano, Giovanna
    BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, 2019, (02): : 95 - 111
  • [29] REPRESENTING INDIGENOUS SELF-DETERMINATION
    Murphy, Michael A.
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LAW JOURNAL, 2008, 58 (02) : 185 - 216
  • [30] Self-determination and cultural difference
    Hope, Simon
    POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 58 (01) : 23 - 41