Contemporary practice patterns in the treatment of Fournier's gangrene in German academic medicine and their implications for planning a registry study

被引:0
作者
Kranz, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Wagenlehner, Florian M. E. [3 ]
Steffens, Joachim [1 ]
Hakenberg, Oliver W. [4 ]
Schneidewind, Laila [4 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp GGmbH, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, Eschweiler, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Halle Saale, Univ Klin & Poliklin Urol, Halle, Saale, Germany
[3] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Klin Urol Kinderurol & Androl, Giessen, Germany
[4] Univ Med Rostock, Urol Klin & Poliklin, Schillingallee 35, D-18055 Rostock, Germany
来源
UROLOGE | 2021年 / 60卷 / 05期
关键词
Urinary tract infections; Sepsis; Fournier’ s gangrene; Mortality rate; Registry study;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-021-01461-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a sporadic and life-threatening disease, but the outcome has not improved in recent years. Objectives The primary aim of this study was the description of current practice patterns in German academic medicine. The secondary aim was the identification of factors associated with a higher mortality rate. Furthermore, the data will be used for the planning of a registry study. Materials and methods A 29-item nonvalidated questionnaire was sent to German University Medical Centers (Department of Urology), including three reminders from April through June 2020. Data management and analysis were performed with SPSS 26.0. Results The response rate was 88.9%. A median of 5 patients (median age 60.0 years) with FG were treated annually in German University Medical Centers. The contemporary practice patterns are very heterogeneous, especially in terms of empirical antibiotic treatment. Only one significant risk factor for a mortality rate higher than 20.0% was identified-intensive care treatment for >= 10 days (p = 0.039). In addition, 50% stated that outcome of FG has not improved in recent years. Furthermore, the majority of the respondents think that mortality is still too high. Consequently, 84.4% support a registry study. From the answers to the open questions we received a variety of suggestions for planning such a study, e.g., histological confirmation of the disease. Conclusion Treatment of FG is currently very heterogeneous. Furthermore, treatment outcomes are often unacceptable and difficult to predict.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 616
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Significance of Hyperbaric Oxygenation in the Treatment of Fournier's Gangrene: A Comparative Study
    Anheuser, Petra
    Muehlstaedt, Sandra
    Kranz, Jennifer
    Schneidewind, Laila
    Steffens, Joachim
    Fornara, Paolo
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 101 (04) : 467 - 471
  • [2] Causative Pathogens, Antibiotic Sensitivity, Resistance Patterns, and Severity in a Contemporary Series of Fournier's Gangrene
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    O'Grady, Thomas
    Kim, Dae Y.
    Divakaruni, Naveen
    Drago, Andrew
    Blumetti, Jennifer
    Hollowell, Courtney M. P.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (04) : 752 - 758
  • [3] Evaluation of the utility of different scoring systems (FGSI, LRINEC and NLR) in the management of Fournier's gangrene
    Bozkurt, Ozan
    Sen, Volkan
    Demir, Omer
    Esen, Adil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (02) : 243 - 248
  • [4] A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Duffett, Mark
    Kho, Michelle E.
    Meade, Maureen O.
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    Sinuff, Tasnim
    Cook, Deborah J.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2008, 179 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [5] Emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) causing Fournier's gangrene
    Chia, Laura
    Crum-Cianflone, Nancy F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2018, 76 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [6] Treatment, outcome and quality of life after Fournier's gangrene: a multicentre study
    Czymek, R.
    Kujath, P.
    Bruch, H. -P.
    Pfeiffer, D.
    Nebrig, M.
    Seehofer, D.
    Guckelberger, O.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (12) : 1529 - 1536
  • [7] Overview of different scoring systems in Fournier's Gangrene and assessment of prognostic factors
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    Karagoz, Mehmet Ali
    Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
    Karakan, Tolga
    Yuceturk, Cem Nedim
    Sarici, Hasmet
    Ozgur, Berat Cem
    Eroglu, Muzaffer
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 42 (03): : 190 - 196
  • [8] Fournier's gangrene: a review of 1726 cases
    Eke, N
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (06) : 718 - 728
  • [10] Fournier's Gangrene: A Review and Outcome Comparison from 2009 to 2016
    Ferretti, Mark
    Saji, Akhil A.
    Phillips, John
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE, 2017, 6 (09) : 289 - 295