Flexural Performance of FRP-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beam

被引:11
|
作者
Goonewardena, Janeshka [1 ]
Ghabraie, Kazem [1 ]
Subhani, Mahbube [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, Vic 3216, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE | 2020年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
geopolymer concrete; CFRP; GFRP; flexural capacity; theoretical prediction; ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER; FLY-ASH; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; BEHAVIOR; GFRP; STRENGTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/jcs4040187
中图分类号
TB33 [复合材料];
学科分类号
摘要
Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) rebar and geopolymer concrete (GPC) are relatively new construction materials that are now been increasingly used in the construction sectors. Both materials exhibit superior structural and durability properties that also make them a sustainable alternative solution. Due to the absence of any design standard for an FRP-reinforced GPC beam, it is important to validate the efficacy of available standards and literature related to other materials, e.g., FRP-reinforced conventional concrete or GPC alone. Four theories/design standards are considered for this comparison-ACI440.1R-15, CAN/CSA S806-12, parabolic stress block theory, and equivalent rectangular stress block theory for GPC under compression. The accuracy of these four approaches is also examined by studying the flexural performance of both the glass FRP (GFRP) and carbon FRP (CFRP). The FRP-reinforced beams are designed against the actual load they will be subjected to in a real-world scenario. It is concluded that parabolic stress block theory over-estimates the capacity, whereas CSA S806-12 yields the most accurate and conservative results. In addition, the flexural performance of the FRP-reinforced beams is evaluated in terms of ultimate, cracking, and service moment capacity, along with serviceable, ultimate, and residual deflection.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bond and anchorage performance of beam flexural bars in beam-column joints using slag-based geopolymer concrete and their effect on seismic performance
    Mao, Yuguang
    Hwang, Hyeon-Jong
    Du, Yunxing
    Su, Jie
    Hu, Xiang
    Liu, Yuzhong
    Shi, Caijun
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 273
  • [32] Punching shear strength and deformation for FRP-reinforced concrete slabs without shear reinforcements
    Deifalla, A.
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2022, 16
  • [33] Compressive Strength of FRP-Reinforced and Confined Concrete Columns
    Raza, Ali
    Ali, Babar
    Haq, Faraz Ul
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 46 (01) : 271 - 284
  • [34] A new composite element for FRP-reinforced concrete slabs
    Zhang, Y. X.
    Zhu, Y.
    CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2010, : 203 - +
  • [35] Delamination of FRP-reinforced concrete by means of an extended finite element formulation
    Benvenuti, Elena
    Vitarelli, Ottavia
    Tralli, Antonio
    COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2012, 43 (08) : 3258 - 3269
  • [36] Estimation of the crack width and deformation of FRP-reinforced concrete flexural members with and without transverse shear reinforcement
    Noel, Martin
    Soudki, Khaled
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 59 : 393 - 398
  • [37] Flexural performance of UHPC two-way slab reinforced with FRP bars
    Chen, Jiaxing
    Fang, Zhi
    Fang, Chuan
    Tan, Xingyu
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 322
  • [38] Punching Shear Strength of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Slabs without Shear Reinforcements: A Reliability Assessment
    Alkhatib, Soliman
    Deifalla, Ahmed
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [39] Seismic performance of interior beam-column joints using reinforced slag-based geopolymer concrete
    Mao, Yuguang
    Du, Yunxing
    Hwang, Hyeon-Jong
    Su, Jie
    Hu, Xiang
    Liu, Yuzhong
    Shi, Caijun
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (02) : 285 - 307
  • [40] Experimental study on the flexural deflections of concrete beam reinforced with Basalt FRP bars
    Zhang, Lianzhen
    Sun, Yongming
    Xiong, Wei
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 48 (10) : 3279 - 3293