Factors for predicting cesarean section during epidural analgesia: a retrospective study

被引:1
作者
Wang, L. [1 ]
Zhao, N. [1 ]
Zhou, J. [2 ]
Xu, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, 251 Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing 100026, Peoples R China
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Dept Anesthesia, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Labor; Epidural analgesia; Cesarean section; Vaginal delivery; LABOR ANALGESIA; DELIVERY; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.12891/ceog4698.2019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of investigation: To explore the risk factors for cesarean section during trial of labor with epidural analgesia. Materials and methods: A total of 100 parturients who received epidural analgesia were selected for this study. Fifty parturients underwent vaginal deliveries and 50 parturients underwent cesarean sections. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was carried out with the continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl at 6 ml/h with patient-controlled analgesia (6 ml/time, locked time 15 minutes). Results: The univariate analysis showed a significant difference in the gestational age of parturients between cesarean section and vaginal delivery (p = 0.013). Compared with the parturients in the vaginal delivery group, cesarean section group parturients showed longer interval time from epidural analgesia to cesarean section (p < 0.001), a higher number of analgesia interventions (p < 0.001), higher doses of PCEA (p < 0.001), and higher number of top-ups (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high gestational age and long interval time were strongly associated with a high possibility of cesarean section during epidural analgesia. Conclusion: High gestational age and long interval time are important risk factors for the prediction of cesarean section during epidural analgesia.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 446
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Prolonged second stage of labor is associated with low Apgar score
    Altman, Maria
    Sandstrom, Anna
    Petersson, Gunnar
    Frisell, Thomas
    Cnattingius, Sven
    Stephansson, Olof
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 30 (11) : 1209 - 1215
  • [2] Anim-Somuah M., 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4
  • [3] Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes
    Cambic, C. R.
    Wong, C. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 105 : I50 - I60
  • [4] The experience of giving birth with epidural analgesia
    Jepsen, Ingrid
    Keller, Kurt Dauer
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2014, 27 (02) : 98 - 103
  • [5] Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Landy, Helain J.
    Iqbal, Sara N.
    Huang, Chun-Chih
    Grantz, Katherine L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (04)
  • [6] Controversies in Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia
    Lermitte, J.
    Morosan, M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (08) : 934 - 934
  • [7] Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia
    Lieberman, E
    Davidson, K
    Lee-Parritz, A
    Shearer, E
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05) : 974 - 982
  • [8] Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review
    Liu, EHC
    Sia, ATH
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7453): : 1410 - 1412B
  • [9] Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years
    Loubert, C.
    Hinova, A.
    Fernando, R.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (03) : 191 - 212
  • [10] MacArthur C, 2001, LANCET, V358, P19