Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 740 patients

被引:65
|
作者
Kim, Bum Jun [1 ,4 ]
Hyung, Jaewon [1 ]
Yoo, Changhoon [1 ]
Kim, Kyu-pyo [1 ]
Park, Seong-Joon [1 ]
Lee, Sang Soo [2 ]
Park, Do Hyun [2 ]
Song, Tae Jun [2 ]
Seo, Dong Wan [2 ]
Lee, Sung Koo [2 ]
Kim, Myung-Hwan [2 ]
Park, Jin-hong [3 ]
Cho, Hyungwoo [1 ]
Ryoo, Baek-Yeol [1 ]
Chang, Heung-Moon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, 88 Olymp Ro,43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Cholangiocarcinoma; Biliary tract cancer; First-line chemotherapy; Gemcitabine plus cisplatin; GEMCIS; Prognostic factor; 2ND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER; COMBINATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-017-3353-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a heterogeneous group of diseases comprising intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. Although gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) was established as the standard first-line chemotherapy based on the ABC-02 trial, more data are needed to define the clinical course of BTC and its prognostic factors with the standard GEMCIS treatment. Between April 2010 and June 2016, 740 patients with histologically documented cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer were treated with first-line GEMCIS in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. In 389 patients with measurable disease (53%), the objective response rate was 13% (n = 50) and there was no significant difference between primary tumor sites (p = 0.45). With a median follow-up duration of 27.3 months (95% CI 24.2-30.5), the median PFS and OS were 5.2 months (95% CI 4.7-5.6) and 10.4 months (95% CI 9.6-11.2), respectively. In multivariate analysis, male gender (female versus male, hazard ratio [HR] 0.83), baseline CA 19-9 level (elevated versus normal, HR 1.31), initially metastatic disease (versus locally advanced disease, HR 1.92), poor performance status (2 versus 0-1, HR 1.45), and measurable disease by RECIST criteria (versus non-measurable, HR 1.40) were significantly associated with a poorer OS (all p < 0.05). Our retrospective analysis of a large number of patients in a real-world setting found comparable efficacy outcomes to the ABC-02 trial. The prognostic factors identified here may help to predict clinical outcomes and design future clinical trials for advanced BTC.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 215
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Three-weekly oxaliplatin combined with gemcitabine and capecitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
    Petrioli, Roberto
    Roviello, Giandomenico
    Fiaschi, Anna I.
    Laera, Letizia
    Roviello, Franco
    Marrelli, Daniele
    Francini, Edoardo
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2015, 26 (06) : 682 - 686
  • [42] Prognostic and predictive factors for Taiwanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancer undergoing frontline chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin: a real-world experience
    Chiao-En Wu
    Wen-Chi Chou
    Chia-Hsun Hsieh
    John Wen-Cheng Chang
    Cheng-Yu Lin
    Chun-Nan Yeh
    Jen-Shi Chen
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [43] Lenvatinib Beyond First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
    Wang, Yunchao
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Wang, Dongxu
    Yang, Xu
    Wang, Yanyu
    Long, Junyu
    Zhou, Jinxue
    Lu, Zhenhui
    Mao, Yilei
    Sang, Xinting
    Guan, Mei
    Zhao, Haitao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [44] A retrospective study of patient-tailored FOLFIRINOX as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
    Ayhan Ulusakarya
    Abdoulaye Karaboué
    Oriana Ciacio
    Gabriella Pittau
    Mazen Haydar
    Pamela Biondani
    Yusuf Gumus
    Amale Chebib
    Wathek Almohamad
    Pasquale F. Innominato
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [45] A retrospective study of patient-tailored FOLFIRINOX as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
    Ulusakarya, Ayhan
    Karaboue, Abdoulaye
    Ciacio, Oriana
    Pittau, Gabriella
    Haydar, Mazen
    Biondani, Pamela
    Gumus, Yusuf
    Chebib, Amale
    Almohamad, Wathek
    Innominato, Pasquale F.
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [46] Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy
    Takashi Sasaki
    Hiroyuki Isayama
    Yousuke Nakai
    Osamu Togawa
    Hirofumi Kogure
    Yukiko Ito
    Keisuke Yamamoto
    Suguru Mizuno
    Hiroshi Yagioka
    Yoko Yashima
    Kazumichi Kawakubo
    Toshihiko Arizumi
    Saburo Matsubara
    Naoki Sasahira
    Kenji Hirano
    Takeshi Tsujino
    Nobuo Toda
    Minoru Tada
    Masao Omata
    Kazuhiko Koike
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2011, 67 : 847 - 853
  • [47] The Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients with Gemcitabine-refractory Biliary Tract Cancer
    Okano, Naohiro
    Kasuga, Akiyoshi
    Kawai, Kirio
    Yamauchi, Yoshiya
    Kobayashi, Takaaki
    Naruge, Daisuke
    Nagashima, Fumio
    Furuse, Junji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (03) : 1755 - 1761
  • [48] A pilot study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced biliary tract cancer
    Lee, Kyong Joo
    Yi, Seung Woo
    Cha, Jihye
    Seong, Jinsil
    Bang, Seungmin
    Song, Si Young
    Kim, Hee Man
    Park, Seung Woo
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 78 (04) : 841 - 846
  • [49] Evaluation of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Relapse and Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer, Treated with S-1 after Failure of Gemcitabine
    Nakai, Masato
    Kikkawa, Akiyoshi
    Funahara, Hiroko
    Matsumoto, Shunji
    Hiraki, Koichi
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2022, 142 (09): : 1021 - 1029
  • [50] Gemcitabine and S-1 versus gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter retrospective study
    Naminatsu Takahara
    Hiroyuki Isayama
    Yousuke Nakai
    Takashi Sasaki
    Kazunaga Ishigaki
    Kei Saito
    Dai Akiyama
    Rie Uchino
    Suguru Mizuno
    Hiroshi Yagioka
    Hirofumi Kogure
    Osamu Togawa
    Saburo Matsubara
    Yukiko Ito
    Nobuo Toda
    Minoru Tada
    Kazuhiko Koike
    Investigational New Drugs, 2017, 35 : 269 - 276