Disruption of response inhibition circuits in prodromal Huntington disease

被引:30
|
作者
Rao, Julia A. [1 ]
Harrington, Deborah L. [2 ,3 ]
Durgerian, Sally [4 ]
Reece, Christine [5 ]
Mourany, Lyla [5 ]
Koenig, Katherine [6 ]
Lowe, Mark J. [6 ]
Magnotta, Vincent A. [7 ]
Long, Jeffrey D. [7 ]
Johnson, Hans J. [7 ]
Paulsen, Jane S. [7 ]
Rao, Stephen M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] VA San Diego Hlthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Neurol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Neurol Inst, Schey Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[7] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
fMRI; Response inhibition; Huntington's disease; Brain activation; Brain atrophy; Neuropsychological testing; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX; AGE-OF-ONSET; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; MOTOR INHIBITION; REPEAT LENGTH; BRAIN; MRI; DYSFUNCTION; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.018
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Cognitive changes in the prodromal phase of Huntington disease (prHD) are found in multiple domains, yet their neural bases are not well understood. One component process that supports cognition is inhibitory control. In the present fMRI study, we examined brain circuits involved in response inhibition in 65 prHD participants and 36 gene-negative (NEG) controls using the stop signal task (SST). PrHD participants were subdivided into three groups (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH) based on their CAG-Age Product (CAP) score, an index of genetic exposure and a proxy for expected time to diagnosis. Poorer response inhibition (stop signal duration) correlated with CAP scores. When response inhibition was successful, activation of the classic frontal inhibitory-network was normal in prHD, yet stepwise reductions in activation with proximity to diagnosis were found in the posterior ventral attention network (inferior parietal and temporal cortices). Failures in response inhibition in prHD were related to changes in inhibition centers (supplementary motor area (SMA)/anterior cingulate and inferior frontal cortex/insula) and ventral attention networks, where activation decreased with proximity to diagnosis. The LOW group showed evidence of early compensatory activation (hyperactivation) of right-hemisphere inhibition and attention reorienting centers, despite an absence of cortical atrophy or deficits on tests of executive functioning. Moreover, greater activation for failed than successful inhibitions in an ipsilateral motor-control network was found in the control group, whereas such differences were markedly attenuated in all prHD groups. The results were not related to changes in cortical volume and thickness, which did not differ among the groups. However, greater hypoactivation of classic right-hemisphere inhibition centers [inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)/insula, SMA/anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)] during inhibition failures correlated with greater globus pallidus atrophy. These results are the first to demonstrate that response inhibition in prHD is associated with altered functioning in brain networks that govern inhibition, attention, and motor control. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 85
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Unified Staging System for Prodromal and Manifest Huntington's disease
    Mohan, A.
    Sun, Z.
    Ghosh, S.
    Li, Y.
    Cheng, Y.
    Hu, J.
    Sampaio, C.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2019, 34 : S13 - S13
  • [22] Cognitive decline in prodromal Huntington Disease: implications for clinical trials
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    Smith, Megan M.
    Long, Jeffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 84 (11): : 1233 - 1239
  • [23] Longitudinal change in regional brain volumes in prodromal Huntington disease
    Aylward, Elizabeth H.
    Nopoulos, Peggy C.
    Ross, Christopher A.
    Langbehn, Douglas R.
    Pierson, Ronald K.
    Mills, James A.
    Johnson, Hans J.
    Magnotta, Vincent A.
    Juhl, Andrew R.
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 82 (04): : 405 - 410
  • [25] Couples' Coping in Prodromal Huntington Disease: A Mixed Methods Study
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Williams, Janet K.
    Leserman, Anne L.
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (05) : 662 - 670
  • [26] Verbal working memory deficits in prodromal Huntington's disease
    Gooblar, J.
    Possin, K.
    Kang, G.
    Gritzer, L.
    Berhel, A.
    Geschwind, M.
    Miller, B. L.
    Hess, C. P.
    Kramer, J. H.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2011, 26 : S61 - S61
  • [27] Biological markers of cognition in prodromal Huntington's disease: A review
    Papp, Kathryn V.
    Kaplan, Richard F.
    Snyder, Peter J.
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2011, 77 (02) : 280 - 291
  • [28] Severity of Depressive Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment in Prodromal Huntington Disease
    Smith, M.
    Moser, D.
    Mills, J.
    Epping, E.
    Paulsen, J.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 26 (06) : 493 - 493
  • [29] Couples' Attributions for Work Function Changes in Prodromal Huntington Disease
    Rabinowitz-Abrams, Deborah
    Morgan, Debra
    Morse, James
    Miesfeldt, Susan
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2010, 19 (04) : 353 - 359
  • [30] Brain compensation during response inhibition in premanifest Huntington's disease
    Soloveva, Maria, V
    Jamadar, Sharna D.
    Hughes, Matthew
    Velakoulis, Dennis
    Poudel, Govinda
    Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2020, 141