Comparative efficacy and acceptability of seven augmentation agents for treatment-resistant depression: A multiple-treatments meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, X. [1 ]
Huang, S. [1 ]
Qi, H. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
PARTIAL RESPONDERS; COGNITIVE THERAPY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; LITHIUM; STRATEGIES; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; FLUOXETINE; LAMOTRIGINE; MEDICATION;
D O I
10.7196/SAJP.530
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Augmentation pharmacotherapy is effective for TRD, but it is still unclear which augmentation agent is most efficacious. Objective. To assess the effects of seven augmentation agents on TRD. Methods. We did a multiple-treatments meta-analysis, accounting for both direct and indirect comparisons. PubMed, the Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Web of Science, Embase, CBM-disc, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and relevant websites (up to August 2013) were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about augmentation agents. The following terms were used 'potentiation', 'augmentation', and 'adjunct' paired with 'depression' and 'resistant depression'. No language limitation was imposed. Results. We systematically reviewed 12 RCTs (1 936 participants), which included seven augmentation agents: lithium, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), buspirone, cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and tri-iodothyronine (T3). The results revealed that T3 was more efficacious than lithium, TCAs, AAPs, AEDs, buspirone and CBT with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.58, 1.56, 1.51, 1.47, 1.77 and 1.25, respectively. ORs favoured CBT compared with lithium, TCAs, AAPs, AEDs and buspirone. Buspirone was the least efficacious of all the other augmentation agents tested. AAPs were significantly more acceptable than lithium, and CBT more than buspirone. T3 was slightly more acceptable than lithium, and CBT more than AAPs. Conclusion. T3 as an augmentation agent should be a clinician's first consideration instead of lithium in acute treatment for TRD. CBT might be a good augmentation agent in some communities. Buspirone should be a final option as an augmentation agent. Further research is needed, such as a well-designed, large-scale controlled trial, to support and draw definite conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 76
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of drug treatments for bipolar depression: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
    Taylor, D. M.
    Cornelius, V.
    Smith, L.
    Young, A. H.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 130 (06) : 452 - 469
  • [2] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressant treatment in poststroke depression: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
    Sun, Yefei
    Liang, Yifan
    Jiao, Yang
    Lin, Jueying
    Qu, Huiling
    Xu, Junjie
    Zhao, Chuansheng
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [3] Comparative Efficacy, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Augmentation Agents in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Xinyu
    Ravindran, Arun V.
    Qin, Bin
    Del Giovane, Cinzia
    Li, Qi
    Bauer, Michael
    Liu, Yiyun
    Fang, Yiru
    da Silva, Tricia
    Zhang, Yuqing
    Fang, Liang
    Wang, Xiao
    Xie, Peng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 76 (04) : E487 - +
  • [4] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Furukawa, Toshiaki A.
    Salanti, Georgia
    Geddes, John R.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Churchill, Rachel
    Watanabe, Norio
    Nakagawa, Atsuo
    Omori, Ichiro M.
    McGuire, Hugh
    Tansella, Michele
    Barbui, Corrado
    LANCET, 2009, 373 (9665) : 746 - 758
  • [5] Lamotrigine augmentation in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
    Goh, Kah Kheng
    Chen, Chun-Hsin
    Chiu, Yi-Hang
    Lu, Mong-Liang
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 33 (06) : 700 - 713
  • [6] Relative effectiveness of augmentation treatments for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Carter, Ben
    Strawbridge, Rebecca
    Husain, Muhammad Ishrat
    Jones, Brett D. M.
    Short, Roxanna
    Cleare, Anthony J.
    Tsapekos, Dimosthenis
    Patrick, Fiona
    Marwood, Lindsey
    Taylor, Rachael W.
    Mantingh, Tim
    de Angel, Valeria
    Nikolova, Viktoriya L.
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Young, Allan H.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 32 (5-6) : 477 - 490
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmentation and combination treatments for early-stage treatment-resistant depression
    Scott, Fraser
    Hampsey, Elliot
    Gnanapragasam, Sam
    Carter, Ben
    Marwood, Lindsey
    Taylor, Rachael W.
    Emre, Cansu
    Korotkova, Lora
    Martin-Dombrowski, Jonatan
    Cleare, Anthony J.
    Young, Allan H.
    Strawbridge, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 (03) : 268 - 278
  • [8] Augmentation therapies for treatment-resistant depression: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Strawbridge, Rebecca
    Carter, Ben
    Marwood, Lindsey
    Bandelow, Borwin
    Tsapekos, Dimosthenis
    Nikolova, Viktoriya L.
    Taylor, Rachael
    Mantingh, Tim
    de Angel, Valeria
    Patrick, Fiona
    Cleare, Anthony J.
    Young, Allan H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 214 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [9] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of neuromodulation procedures in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Hao
    Cui, Liqian
    Li, Jinbiao
    Liu, Yueheng
    Chen, Yue
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 287 : 115 - 124
  • [10] Comparative efficacy, acceptability, and safety of medicinal, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and placebo treatments for acute major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
    Ma, Dongfeng
    Zhang, Zhijun
    Zhang, Xiangrong
    Li, Lingjiang
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (06) : 971 - 995